Re: [Development] Stepping down as maintainer of project management in Qt Creator

+1 Thanks for all the amazing work.. []'s On Thu, 20 Dec 2018 at 12:42, Joerg Bornemann wrote: > On 12/19/18 4:43 PM, Tobias Hunger wrote: > > > I want to propose Christian Kandeler to take over. He is a capable > > developer with a deep understanding of the code involved and I am sure > > he

Re: [Development] Strange behavior on 5.12 branch and moc genrated file ( KDE application )

e/kde/src/frameworks/kcoreaddons/autotests/jsonplugin2.cpp []'s On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 19:05, Thiago Macieira wrote: > On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 09:57:30 PDT Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Wednesday, 5 September 2018 00:20:22 PDT Helio Chissini de Castro > wrote: > > >

Re: [Development] Strange behavior on 5.12 branch and moc genrated file ( KDE application )

Unfortunately not. Just compiled again reverting this commit and the issue still there. No ideas for now :-/ On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 10:17, Liang Qi wrote: > Perhaps it's related with https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/235352/ . > > --Liang > > On Wed, 5 Sep 2018 at 09:20, He

[Development] Strange behavior on 5.12 branch and moc genrated file ( KDE application )

Morning guys After compile 5.12 branch from yesterday morning, i got one KDE application failing due a compiler error on a generated moc file. Is there any moc relevant change ? I didn't change my compiler environment from previous 5.11 and always compile all in a clean chroot, with no previous

Re: [Development] 5.7.0-rc compile error

Are you trying out of the source builds ? I opened a ticket yesterday for this, specifically Qt3D, but it can compiles if you run from the root tree on the source. Regards On Thu, Jun 16, 2016 at 11:27 AM, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > >>would be nice if this could be fixed

Re: [Development] Fwd: [Interest] Qt 5.6.0 (final) packages available

I agreed partially with Lars Is too late *now*, and we can wait for a quick 5.6.1, but is not entirely correct in say that we're not raising this issue from some time. For us in Fedora this issue been happening for a month, since rc releases and the bug was opened 10 days ago so the fact that is

Re: [Development] Qt 5.6.0-rc build issues on CentOS 6.7 x86_64 with g++

Hello again The packages built on copr repository IS 5.6.0rc and is the reference that we use to upstream in Fedora when reach final. This is the proper repository: https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/kdesig/Qt5/ This is the repository to add on Yum

Re: [Development] Qt 5.6.0-rc build issues on CentOS 6.7 x86_64 with g++

Hello all Just a question, did you tried the copr Qt repository that Fedora KDE Sig maintains ? https://copr.fedorainfracloud.org/coprs/g/kdesig We have everything compiled for Fedora 22, 23, rawhide, epel 7 and epel 6, meaning Centos 6 We're unable to dependency reasons have qtserialport,

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.6.0 RC released

Hello Jani Thanks for the packages and submodules in .tar.xz We can confirm from our side that at least in Fedora all modules compiled fine and are in testing repositories. Regards On Wed, Feb 24, 2016 at 6:41 AM, List for announcements regarding Qt releases and development

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.6.0 RC snapshot available, please test

Hello all We are testing packages generated from git branch 5.6.0 from now in Fedora, since fails again to comply on the agreed rules of release splitted tarballs. And sorry, the "is just a snapshot" is no longer a valid excuse. Helio On Fri, Feb 12, 2016 at 1:49 PM, Heikkinen Jani <

Re: [Development] Proposal to include qtscxml as Qt add-on module

Hello I'm just curious, is Qt project aiming for be a umbrella of libraries tied to Qt release or this libraries like QtGamePad on other thread should be more suitable to something like inqlude.org ( or similar ). Just to clarify, as a distro packager too. []'s On Tue, Jan 26, 2016 at 8:47

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.6 Beta released

Thanks for the work Jani Would be so much to ask to have a .xz version of submodules ? We use to have on both https://download.qt.io/development_releases/qt/5.6/5.6.0-alpha/submodules/ and https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.5/5.5.1/submodules/ and they cause sometimes a huge size

Re: [Development] [Announce] Qt 5.6 Beta released

Thanks for the work Jani Would be so much to ask to have a .xz version of submodules ? We use to have on both https://download.qt.io/development_releases/qt/5.6/5.6.0-alpha/submodules/ and https://download.qt.io/official_releases/qt/5.5/5.5.1/submodules/ and they cause sometimes a huge size

Re: [Development] Qt 5.6.0 Beta candidate packages available

les > > > > Br, > > Jani > > > > *From:* heliocas...@gmail.com [mailto:heliocas...@gmail.com] *On Behalf > Of *Helio Chissini de Castro > *Sent:* 10. joulukuuta 2015 13:57 > *To:* Heikkinen Jani <jani.heikki...@theqtcompany.com> > *Cc:* development@qt-project.org &

[Development] New Qt5.6 Beta snapshot available

Well, i'm not relying anymore on the released sources, i'm generating our test tarballs from git, in the specific case, the 5.6 branch. We complained already, and I decided that not worth wait to have our tasks done. If is too difficult to generate the official splitted tarballs, i can offer as

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.6 Beta snapshot available

And for us, distributions, we need at least splitted source codes. We just CAN'T test our packages the way is deployed now. On Wed, Nov 11, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Massimo Callegari < massimocalleg...@yahoo.it> wrote: > Hi, I think there something wrong with the sources package Nov 10th (I >

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.6.0 Beta snapshot available

Hello Jani There's an issue on the src package, no doc subdir was provided under qtbase, not enable us to build docs offline. []'s Helio On Tue, Nov 3, 2015 at 10:06 AM, Heikkinen Jani < jani.heikki...@theqtcompany.com> wrote: > Hi all, > > > We have new Qt 5.6.0 beta snapshot available, > > >

Re: [Development] Request to delete libibusplatforminputcontextplugin.so from qtbase

Hello Takao You're talking over Qt 4 only or Qt 5 is affected as well ? This is a full replacement of the plugin ? Regards, Helio On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 4:29 AM, Takao Fujiwara tfuji...@redhat.com wrote: I maintain IBus project. https://github.com/ibus/ibus/wiki Now I wish to delete

Re: [Development] New Qt 5.5.0 snapshot available - aimed to be final packages

Hello Can you please generate the splitted set of packages ? []'s On Mon, Jun 29, 2015 at 4:13 AM, Salovaara Akseli akseli.salova...@theqtcompany.com wrote: Hi all, We have new Qt 5.5.0 packages available which are aimed to be final. Windows:

Re: [Development] 5.5 third-party update

I asked for the update after the list was updated in https://drive.google.com/open?id=1xOAI87zKy6w7VSvSzQrIA_zeZBLuTgoSmNU-vAXrIhYauthuser=0 AFAIK, this is the last status, and the only significant older library is libjpeg but no one gave green light to do it. And i not verified the status of

Re: [Development] Updating of 3rdparty stuff

So, no more coments. It's ok to go ahead and update + push to review the ones not already there ? []'s On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 2:20 PM, Konstantin Ritt ritt...@gmail.com wrote: Added some comments to your spreadsheet Regards, Konstantin 2015-04-08 19:42 GMT+04:00 Helio Chissini de Castro

Re: [Development] Updating of 3rdparty stuff

Hi I just started a simple spreadsheet on the status of 3rdparty code. I enabled the doc to comments. Here: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1xOAI87zKy6w7VSvSzQrIA_zeZBLuTgoSmNU-vAXrIhY/edit?usp=sharing Now need discover the feasibility to do some of them. []'s Helio On Wed, Apr 8,

Re: [Development] Updating of 3rdparty stuff

What we need look for to proceed ? Or just look on modules, update, test on the platforms and do a proper pull request ? On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 11:22 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: On Tuesday 07 April 2015 12:24:57 Nicola De Filippo wrote: Hi, all 3rdparty or only in

Re: [Development] Updating of 3rdparty stuff

Raising my hand to help. []'s Helio On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 1:56 AM, Thiago Macieira thiago.macie...@intel.com wrote: Any volunteers? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open Source Technology Center