Hi,
I’d like to request a new repository on codereview.qt-project.org.
Name: qt/qtstatemachines
Description: Qt State Machine framework
Responsible person: Karsten Heimrich
(karsten.heimr...@qt.io<mailto:karsten.heimr...@qt.io>)
This is extracted from the code that so far lived within
hort term before the FF.
-- Karsten
From: Development On Behalf Of Karsten
Heimrich
Sent: Thursday, January 21, 2021 10:50 AM
To: development@qt-project.org
Subject: [Development] Request to rename module qtscxml to qtstatemachine
Hi,
with Qt6 we removed the QtStateMachine implementation from qt
Hi,
with Qt6 we removed the QtStateMachine implementation from qtbase and moved it
into qtscxml. While the name was ok when the module contained only SCXML
releated code, it contains now both state machine implementations. Hence I
would like to propose/request to rename the module to
Hi,
as it seems we will not be able to reach a broader consent on the usage of
std:: smart pointers in our current API because of several reasons:
* the resulting API might be inconsistent
* slow adaptation in user code after the massive API change
* current legacy code base is to huge to adapt
HI,
maybe I send out the wrong signal, but currently the suggestion is to keep the
implementations, just unify them in a separate module.
-- Karsten
From: Jean-Michaël Celerier
Sent: Donnerstag, 13. Februar 2020 12:03 Uhr
To: Karsten Heimrich
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re
Hi,
we would like to remove the QStatemachine API's from Qt Core. We identified 2
options to do this:
* Move into QtScXML and keep both the implementation
* rename the module to reflect that it contains 2 different state machine
implementations
* Move into Qt5Compat
* in the
-Original Message-
>From: André Pönitz
>Sent: Mittwoch, 12. Februar 2020 19:38 Uhr
>To: Vitaly Fanaskov
>Cc: Karsten Heimrich ; development@qt-project.org
>Subject: Re: [Development] The future of smart pointers in Qt API
>
>On Wed, Feb 12, 2020 at 11:13:17AM +
Many thanks Vitaly for taking the time and effort to get the discussion going.
-Original Message-
>From: Development On Behalf Of Vitaly
>Fanaskov
>Sent: Dienstag, 11. Februar 2020 16:15 Uhr
>To: development @qt-project.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] The future of smart pointers in Qt
Hi,
we are planning to continue some work on the QFuture, QtConcurrent APIs, either
improve up on the existing implementation or deprecate and remove them
completely for Qt6. We've created a user story in Jira and like to gather some
feedback here. So if this topic is of interest for you, I
+1
--Karsten
-Original Message-
From: Development On Behalf Of Andy Shaw
Sent: Dienstag, 26. November 2019 10:35 Uhr
To: Alex Blasche ; development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] Nominating André Hartmann for maintainer for QCanBus
API
+1
Andy
-Opprinnelig
time with Qt in general.
Regards,
Karsten
Karsten Heimrich, Software engineer | The Qt Company
The Qt Company GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius, Mika Harjuaho. Sitz der
Gesellschaft: Berlin, Registergericht: Amtsgericht Charlottenburg,
HRB 1443
Hi,
I am happy to inform you that we uploaded an initial version of our Qt Visual
Studio Tools with support for VS 2017 to
http://download.qt.io/development_releases/vsaddin
br,
Karsten Heimrich
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
it on your own by
inheriting from one of the QModbusServer descendants. We are also open for
patches that provide the missing implementation.
Obviously you found the issue on jira already:
https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-49510?filter=17150
Regards,
Karsten Heimrich
Senior Software Engineer
Hi,
just a short note, we already added API for overwriting the timeout in 5.7. See
http://doc-snapshots.qt.io/qt5-5.7/qmodbusrtuserialmaster.html#setInterFrameDelay
But as seen here
http://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtserialbus.git/tree/src/serialbus/qmodbusrtuserialmaster_p.h#n294
we missed to
Hi,
From: Smith Martin [mailto:martin.sm...@theqtcompany.com]
Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 12:17 Uhr
To: Heimrich Karsten ;
development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] We are planning to upgrade qdoc to use clang for
parsing C++
I'm
Hi,
From: Development
[mailto:development-bounces+karsten.heimrich=theqtcompany@qt-project.org]
On Behalf Of Cristian Adam
Sent: Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 11:20 Uhr
To: Smith Martin
Cc: development@qt-project.org
Subject: Re: [Development] We are
On 13.04.2015 07:43, Berkay Elbir wrote:
Hello all;
I am using Qt installer 2.0.0. But I can not run my installer.exe as
an Admin.
I updated my config.xml file like this :
AdminTargetDirTargetDir @ / AdminTargetDir
That cannot fix your issue, it's not used on Windows.
but problem is still
if the application is running.
More information can be found here:
http://doc.qt.io/qtinstallerframework/noninteractive.html
http://doc.qt.io/qtinstallerframework/scripting-installer.html#isProcessRunning-method
Regards,
Karsten Heimrich, Senior Software Engineer | The Qt Company
Digia Germany
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
Regards,
-
Karsten Heimrich, Senior Software Engineer | The Qt Company
Digia Germany GmbH, Rudower Chaussee 13, D-12489 Berlin
Geschäftsführer: Mika Pälsi, Juha Varelius
19 matches
Mail list logo