Re: [Development] msvc15 debug/release build crash Qt56 with MT/MTd config option?

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > Subject: Re: [Development] msvc15 debug/release build crash Qt56 with > MT/MTd config option? > > Sorry before for my bad english, my point is that by modifying > mkspecs\common\msvc-desktop.conf to use /MT or /MTd option in >

Re: [Development] qtwebkit fails to build

> -Original Message- > [...] > Failed to open file: > Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtwebkit/Source/WebCore/mathml/mathtags.in > at > Z:/src/kde/qt5/qtwebkit/Source/WebCore/dom/make_names.pl > line 306. > Makefile.WebCore.DerivedSources:786: recipe

Re: [Development] Compiling 5.6.0 with VS2015

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Sandy Martel > Sent: Wednesday, March 30, 2016 2:05 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Compiling 5.6.0 with VS2015 > > Anyone knows

Re: [Development] Problems with QtWebKit 5.6 / Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Adrian Jakel > Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2016 7:00 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Problems with QtWebKit 5.6 / Please do not >

[Development] Qt Coding Guidelines

Hi there, We have had quite some discussions about the use of C++11 features and right API in the past on this mailing list - but if there has been a consensus (which is sometimes hard to find out), it was often buried pretty deep in the mailing thread. IMO it would be good to make decisions mo

Re: [Development] Qt Coding Guidelines

> -Original Message- > From: sergio On Behalf Of Sergio Martins > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 3:16 PM > To: Koehne Kai > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Coding Guidelines > > On Thursday, March 17, 2016 02:30:03 PM Koeh

Re: [Development] Qt Coding Guidelines

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Sergio Martins > Sent: Thursday, March 17, 2016 1:15 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt Coding Guidelines > > On Thursday, M

Re: [Development] Qt Coding Guidelines

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > [...] > It remains that this document is expected to be quite stable, so there would > be some sense to having a stable URL to which we routinely copy the new > version once a change to the source has been accepted. The effo

Re: [Development] Qt 5.6.0-rc build issues on Windows 7 with VC2015 x86 -target XP

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Walter Stefan [mailto:stefan.wal...@lisec.com] > Gesendet: Montag, 14. März 2016 08:29 > An: Koehne Kai ; development@qt- > project.org > Betreff: RE: [Development] Qt 5.6.0-rc build issues on Windows 7 with > VC2015 x86 -target XP &g

Re: [Development] Qt 5.6.0-rc build issues on Windows 7 with VC2015 x86 -target XP

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] Im Auftrag von > Walter Stefan > Gesendet: Sonntag, 13. März 2016 05:48 > An: development@qt-project.org > Betreff: [Development] Qt 5.6.0-rc build issues on Windows 7

Re: [Development] How can Qt 5.6.0 MinGW pass in CI with QTBUG-49971 open?

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 9:14 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] How can Qt 5.6.0 MinGW pass in CI with

Re: [Development] How can Qt 5.6.0 MinGW pass in CI with QTBUG-49971 open?

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Roland Winklmeier > Sent: Thursday, March 03, 2016 10:52 AM > To: Thiago Macieira > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] How can Qt 5.

Re: [Development] Dropping qtserialbus from Qt 5.6 -- it doesn't compile in C++98

IMO https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/151180/1/qtserialbus.pro should fix it. Is there a bug report already that I can link to? Regards Kai > -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Mac

Re: [Development] Q_COMPILER_RANGE_FOR not supported by/defined for VS2012 and VS2013 ?

OR not supported > by/defined for VS2012 and VS2013 ? > > On terça-feira, 1 de março de 2016 07:37:02 PST Koehne Kai wrote: > > Well, we have also experienced reviewers + a CI system that will catch > > simple compiler errors. So don't be shy to submit stuff even if y

Re: [Development] Q_COMPILER_RANGE_FOR not supported by/defined for VS2012 and VS2013 ?

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Michael Mollney > Sent: Monday, February 29, 2016 10:14 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Q_COMPILER_RANGE_FOR not supported >

Re: [Development] porting

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of ravi > kumar verma > Sent: Friday, February 26, 2016 3:41 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] porting > > > > hi, > How do we port

Re: [Development] Though about rich text (html, WebView) rendering

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Fabrice Salvaire > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 1:33 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Though about rich text (html, WebView)

Re: [Development] Qt 5.6 LTS - who defines criteria what gets "bug fixed"

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Welbourne Edward > Sent: Thursday, February 25, 2016 10:33 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.6 LTS - who defines criteria

Re: [Development] GCC-built Qt 5.6 can't be used with Clang

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Welbourne Edward > Sent: Monday, February 22, 2016 12:05 PM > To: Stephen Kelly ; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] GCC-built Qt 5.6 can

Re: [Development] Modify QLibraryInfo to support any default location of qt.conf

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Andre Somers > Sent: Friday, January 29, 2016 9:05 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Modify QLibraryInfo to support any default > location of qt.conf > > >

Re: [Development] Setup CI service

> -Original Message- > From: Ben Lau [mailto:xben...@gmail.com] > Sent: Wednesday, January 27, 2016 10:57 AM > To: Koehne Kai > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Setup CI service > > > > On 27 January 2016 at 16:1

Re: [Development] Setup CI service

> -Original Message- > From: Ben Lau [mailto:xben...@gmail.com] >[...] > Hi Kai, > > I mean the official Qt offline installer (Linux) downloaded from > https://download.qt.io/archive/qt/5.5/ > > Before Qt 5.5, it could be run in command line environment and extract its > content by " --

Re: [Development] Setup CI service

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Ben Lau > Sent: Tuesday, January 26, 2016 4:37 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Setup CI service > > Hi, > > Since Qt 5.5, the command line installer has been

Re: [Development] Qt WebKit dependency in Qt Assistant

> -Ursprüngliche Nachricht- > Von: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] Im > Auftrag von Kevin Kofler > Gesendet: Mittwoch, 6. Januar 2016 19:15 > An: development@qt-project.org > Betreff: Re: [Development] Qt WebKit dependency in Qt Assistant > > Hi, > > Aleix Pol wr

Re: [Development] New Qt5.6 Beta snapshot available

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Al-Khanji Louai > Sent: Tuesday, December 15, 2015 12:12 AM > To: development@qt-project.org; Florian Bruhin > Cc: anto...@gmx.de > Subject: Re: [Development] New Qt5.6 Beta snapshot avail

Re: [Development] buildsystem now needs to keep behaviour compatibility

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen > Sent: Wednesday, December 09, 2015 11:45 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Cc: releas...@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] buildsystem now needs to keep b

Re: [Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules?

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf > Subject: [Development] RFC: more liberal 'auto' rules? > >[..] > The remainder of the C++ world is moving towards an "always auto" scheme. > We don't need to go there, but I'd at least like t

Re: [Development] Fw: Change in qt/qt5[dev]: Updated submodules.

gt; > On Thursday 26 November 2015 10:10:50 Koehne Kai wrote: > > > -Original Message- > > > From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On > > > Behalf Of Marc Mutz > > > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 9:53 AM > > > To: deve

Re: [Development] Fw: Change in qt/qt5[dev]: Updated submodules.

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf > Of Marc Mutz > Sent: Thursday, November 26, 2015 9:53 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Fw: Change in qt/qt5[dev]: Updated submodules. > > On Wednesday 25 Novem

Re: [Development] RFD: plugins vs QStringLiterals

> -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf > [...] > The problem with SEP is that it only works in so far as there *is* something > the > author of client code can do about the situation. They may not have enough > choice to control th

Re: [Development] RFC: Proposal for a semi-radical change in Qt APIs taking strings

I guess it's not by incidence that there's also a std::string_view coming, see e.g. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H9gAaNRoon4 http://www.open-std.org/jtc1/sc22/wg21/docs/papers/2013/n3762.html So, is this really the same, except non-templated and for QString (with conversion from/to Qt types

Re: [Development] r-value references in API (was: RFC: Proposal for a semi-radical change in Qt APIs taking strings)

a ; development@qt- > project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] r-value references in API (was: RFC: Proposal for a > semi-radical change in Qt APIs taking strings) > > On October 15, 2015 17:58:27 Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > > On Thursday 15 October 2015 07:34:30 K

[Development] Nominating Allan Jensen as maintainer for Qt WebEngine

Hi, I hereby nominate Allan Jensen as the official maintainer for the Qt WebEngine module. He's been the official maintainer for Qt WebKit already, but nowadays works full time on Qt WebEngine, and is also the default assignee for the WebEngine component in JIRA. Regards Kai -- Kai Köhne, S

[Development] r-value references in API (was: RFC: Proposal for a semi-radical change in Qt APIs taking strings)

> -Original Message- > [...] > >BTW: functions storing a passed QString as-is should provide a > >QString&& overload, and that might be a good idea even when otherwise > >using QStringView only. > > Yes, agree with this. I guess this advice is not only for QString arguments though (from 5

Re: [Development] [Qt Installer] QtCreator as optional option

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Volny > Sent: Monday, July 06, 2015 10:16 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Developmen

Re: [Development] std:: in Qt ABI (was: Qt LTS & C++11 plans)

> -Original Message- > Subject: [Development] std:: in Qt ABI (was: Qt LTS & C++11 plans) Side note: Outlook decides to not show the first four characters (std:) in the Subject line/Compact View, and also drops it when Replying. WTF? > [...] > My understanding is that most (all?) Linux d

[Development] std:: in Qt ABI (was: Qt LTS & C++11 plans)

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: Tuesday, June 30, 2015 10:17 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Dev

[Development] Qt & Namespaces (was: RE: Some Qt3D feedback)

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Marc Mutz > Sent: Thursday, June 18, 2015 3:08 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Develop

Re: [Development] Avoid overloading of 'error'

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > [...] > So I recommend we begin the shift now in 5.6 and deprecate the old > methods, to be removed in 6.0. > > As for the implementation, please connect one signal to the other, so we > don't need to dupli

Re: [Development] Avoid overloading of 'error'

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > [...] > If you ask my opinion, 'errorOccurred' sounds like a sensible name. I concur that errorOccurred() is the most sensible choice. It also matches the wording in the existing documentation ('error occ

Re: [Development] QtCS: Notes from Modern C++ session

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > [..] > Depends whether or not we make the choice to break the "no stl in abi" rule. I understood the rule has miniscule practical value, and hinders us from providing the best Qt API possible. So I'm all f

[Development] Avoid overloading of 'error'

Hi, I'm currently converting a codebase from old-style connects to new-style ones. Thanks to Qt Creator's refactoring support this is actually quite easy ... it gets ugly though when either the signal or slot method name is overloaded, and you have to write nice code like connect(&proc

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.2 "RC" packages available for your testing

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Roland Winklmeier > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 3:24 PM > To: Heikkinen Jani > Cc: development@qt-project

Re: [Development] QTextStream::readLine(0) is an ambiguous overload in 5.5

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Julien Blanc > Sent: Monday, May 18, 2015 12:08 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Deve

Re: [Development] Future of Qt Quick 1 in Qt 5

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Frederik Gladhorn > Sent: Friday, May 08, 2015 2:40 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Deve

Re: [Development] Qt Installer (1.5.0) uninstaller customization

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > Subject: [Development] Qt Installer (1.5.0) uninstaller customization > > Hello All, > > How can I control the uninstaller to check program is running or not before > uninstalling program in Qt installer ve

[Development] git://code.qt.io availability

Hi, Since a few days code.qt.io seems to be quite unreliable: Fetching changes via git:// often fail with "fatal: read error: Invalid argument" (Windows) or "fatal: read error: Connection reset by peer" (Linux). Is someone already looking into this? Should we rather clone from the github mirro

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Alex Montgomery > Sent: Monday, March 09, 2015 6:56 PM > To: Knoll Lars > Cc: development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] msvc warning policy in qt

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > [...] > My problems are solved this way ,but i would rather like that qt takes care of > this itself, meaning allowing setting warninglevel to 4 and warnings as errors > and applications compile out of the

Re: [Development] C++11 for Examples

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > [...] > > 2.) Coding convention for C++11 constructs and set of permitted features: > > https://wiki.qt.io/index.php?title=Coding_Conventions#Conventions_for_ > > C.2B.2 > > B11_usage > > I didn't know thi

Re: [Development] QtCore missing check for memory allocation

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Robin Burchell > Sent: Friday, February 27, 2015 11:47 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re

Re: [Development] Git clone hangs on Linux using SSH

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Denis Shienkov > Sent: Thursday, February 26, 2015 9:10 PM > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: R

Re: [Development] Binary compatibility issue 5.4.1?

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Kurt > Pattyn > Sent: Wednesday, February 25, 2015 4:36 PM > To: > Subject: [Development] Binary compatib

Re: [Development] Proposal: Deprecating platforms in Qt 5.6 that don't support lambda

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > [...] > But this is an implementation convenience only. You can't convince me to > drop VS2010 to be able to use them internally inside Qt. Or 2008 for Win CE or > old gcc for blackberry or one of all the oth

Re: [Development] Wich mingw version will be present in 5.4.1?

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > massimo belgrano > Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2015 11:23 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subjec

Re: [Development] Patch in qt installer framework

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Caspar Romot > Sent: Monday, February 02, 2015 7:51 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Deve

Re: [Development] Reproducible Qt ; the purpose of QLibraryInfo::buildDate

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > Sent: Tuesday, February 03, 2015 6:18 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: R

Re: [Development] QOpenGLContext::currentContext()->functions()->glCreateShader(GL_VERTEX_SHADER) returns 0

Note that only the MSVC 2013 binaries for Qt 5.4 where compiled with -opengl dynamic (that is, the MSVC 2013 builds without '-opengl' in the name. You might have another version installed ? Regards Kai Von: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt

Re: [Development] [QtIFW] Offline from online?

> -Original Message- > From: Konstantin Podsvirov [mailto:konstan...@podsvirov.pro] > Sent: Thursday, January 08, 2015 10:07 AM > To: Koehne Kai; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] [QtIFW] Offline from online? > > > > 17.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4 Mingw-4.9.1 offline package

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Cristian Adam > Sent: Monday, January 05, 2015 11:14 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Dev

Re: [Development] [QtIFW] Offline from online?

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > Subject: [Development] [QtIFW] Offline from online? > > Hi, QtIFW develooers!!! Hi, > What about creation offline installers based on shared in online repository > components? So far the IFW doesn't offer

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

ect.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested > > On Thu, 11 Dec 2014 12:09:07 +, Koehne Kai wrote: > > > In general, it's a good idea to follow > > http://qt-project.org/wiki/Building_Qt_5_from_Git (even if the title > > is sligh

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 final packages to be tested

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Uwe Rathmann > Sent: Thursday, December 11, 2014 1:03 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [Development] bundle support in QML

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > [...] > Therefore I propose to remove the command line tool, the bundle loading > support in the engine as well as the auto-tests from the dev branch. +1 . We kind of settled on qrc:// as the 'bundle format'

[Development] Dropping win32-mingw47 from the CI system, adding win32-mingw491 one

Hi, I suggest we drop the win32-mingw47_developer-build-qtlibinfix-Windows configuration from the CI, and replace it by one utilizing mingw-builds i686-4.9.1-release-posix-dwarf-rt_v3-rev2 . This is in addition with the two win32-mingw48 configurations we already have in the CI system. We've b

Re: [Development] Explicit linking vs dlopen/dlsym

>There's dlopen code in QtSerialPort. Something went wrong with the build or >the source code since that was introduced... > >It's a regression, we had that fixed. Indeed. I created https://bugreports.qt-project.org/browse/QTBUG-42805 Regards Kai ___

Re: [Development] [QtIFW] New Console Window on Windows

> -Original Message- > From: Konstantin Podsvirov [mailto:konstan...@podsvirov.pro] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 1:44 PM > To: Koehne Kai; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] [QtIFW] New Console Window on Windows > > 23.10.2014, 15:42,

Re: [Development] [QtIFW] Getting Version

> -Original Message- > From: Konstantin Podsvirov [mailto:konstan...@podsvirov.pro] > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 12:21 PM > To: Koehne Kai; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] [QtIFW] Getting Version > > Hi Kai! > > 23.10.2014, 14:05

Re: [Development] [QtIFW] Getting Version

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Milian Wolff > Sent: Thursday, October 23, 2014 11:59 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re:

Re: [Development] [QtIFW] CPack IFW Generator

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > Subject: [Development] [QtIFW] CPack IFW Generator > > Hello dear developers! > [..] > CPack IFW generator generates installers using QtIFW. > > You can try this using the latest version for developers.

Re: [Development] Calculating JIRA bug priorities

> -Original Message- > [...] > I just want to point out that there already is this nice explanation of > priorities: > https://bugreports.qt- > project.org/secure/ShowConstantsHelp.jspa?#PriorityLevels Well, my issue with this is that it has only some 'hard' hints for P0, P1. It doesn't

Re: [Development] Qt 5.4.0 Beta snapshot available

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- >[...] > I just need a confirmation that if I stage them now, they will still be in the > beta. That'll delay the beta at least till next week, and potentially even longer (given our problems of getting both

[Development] Calculating JIRA bug priorities

Hi, While doing some bug triaging yesterday I noticed that we don't have a common process to assess the priority of a bug. That is, JIRA lists some criteria, and I think there's a common understanding what P0, P1 means ... but when it comes to the difference between P2, P3, P4, and P5 it gets I

Re: [Development] Qt3D Examples

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > [...] > I don't have an "authoritative" answer, but one possible option would be an > sub-module that contains the assets for examples or (easier?) separate the > Qt 3d examples and their assets into a stan

Re: [Development] Optional Dependencies and Distribution of Examples

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > [...] > So far so good. But when qt5.git builds WebChannel without WebSockets > available, the examples wont be build. What implications does this have? > > a) No CI coverage of whether the examples build

Re: [Development] QSettings refactor updates

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany.com@qt- > project.org [mailto:development- > bounces+kai.koehne=theqtcompany@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of > Tomaz Canabrava > Sent: Friday, October 10, 2014 12:54 AM > To: Thiago Macieira > Cc: development@qt-pro

Re: [Development] QtWebEngine is building all needed libs from sources.

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Tomasz Olszak > Sent: Thursday, September 18, 2014 11:35 AM > To: haithem rahmani > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subje

Re: [Development] Requires Analyse: QML Profiler (External) Support

[This thread really is about Qt Creator, so qt-crea...@qt-project.org is the better place. Please drop development@qt-project.org in any further replies] > -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia

Re: [Development] How does QML versioning work?

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] How does QML versioning work? > > Hi all, > > We have a very clearly defined policy on what changes are allowed new > versions of Qt: > > - Patch release: Source & binary compati

Re: [Development] Cake and eating it too for qDebug printing to system log - https://codereview.qt-project.org/89357

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [...] > Some background: on Sailfish, we launch all major system services (and > UI) through systemd services (& user session for the UI parts). Those > processes may then choose to execute processes of

Re: [Development] Cake and eating it too for qDebug printing to system log - https://codereview.qt-project.org/89357

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [...] > Here's what I propose: > > Heuristically determine at runtime. On all platforms (including Windows), use > only the fact that a terminal is present. If a terminal is present, write to > it > u

Re: [Development] Cake and eating it too for qDebug printing to system log - https://codereview.qt-project.org/89357

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: Wednesday, July 09, 2014 11:44 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Cake a

Re: [Development] Cake and eating it too for qDebug printing to system log - https://codereview.qt-project.org/89357

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [...] > On the contrary, the end-user on Windows expects the application logs to be > in a file somewhere near the executable if it's not a system service. So in my > opinion the logs shouldn't write in

Re: [Development] Online installer no longer lets users choose between Qt 5.3.0 and Qt 5.3.1

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [...] > 1) Developers who face regressions (not just testers) are now in an awkward > position, and need to install an extra copy of Qt Creator (see > below) Right, that's the main drawback. We could m

Re: [Development] Online installer no longer lets users choose between Qt 5.3.0 and Qt 5.3.1

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > On Thursday 03 July 2014 10:48:46 Sze Howe Koh wrote: > > Hello, > > > > A user has discovered that the online installer only gives a "Qt 5.3" > > option [1], which doesn't let us install Qt 5.3.0 instead

Re: [Development] Proposal: All Qt modules must use the same version number

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [...] > We'll always have a 1-to-1 mapping of QtWebEngine and Qt versions and > we'll always distribute/test them together. If we release QtWebEngine 1.u.v > with Qt 5.x.y, then QtWebEngine 1.u+1.v will

Re: [Development] New Qt5.3.1 snapshot available

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Heikkinen Jani > Sent: Tuesday, June 17, 2014 8:04 AM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] New Qt5.3.

Re: [Development] new "debugsupport" module and API

> -Original Message- > From: André Pönitz [mailto:apoen...@t-online.de] > [...] > Consolidation of various incarnations of the code might make sense, > exporting would need a good reason. One of the reasons for the different incarnations of the client side of the debug API in Qt Creator &

Re: [Development] new "debugsupport" module and API

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > > we currently have several implementations of the QML debug protocol used > to transmit data between a debugger or profiler and the application being > debugged or profiled. I'm proposing a generalized

Re: [Development] `/opt/qt5/bin/qdoc: not found` with `-prefix /opt/qt5` config

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [...] > -prefix is where you want it to finally end up on the users' computer, but > INSTALL_ROOT is where you want it to get installed to so you can package it > cleanly.. usually. You should be able

Re: [Development] Perceptions/Understandings of the QML language [was: Question about Qt's future]

> -Original Message- > [...] > On to the topic: QML is what the QML parser accepts (that is, JSON like > declarative syntax + JavaScript in certain places). No, there's no standard > document for it (in case that's what you're after), but it has a well-defined > grammar etc. Christian Kamm

Re: [Development] Perceptions/Understandings of the QML language [was: Question about Qt's future]

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Andre Ponitz > Sent: Monday, April 28, 2014 11:34 PM > To: Alan Alpert > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [De

Re: [Development] Qt binaries with inlined functions

> -Original Message- > From: Olivier Goffart [mailto:oliv...@woboq.com] > [...] > Maybe it should go in qt_module.prf Thanks, that takes me one step further - linking Qt5Gui fails next. Anyhow, Qt5Core succeeded: Size of libQt5Core.so.5.3.0 without patch:5.9M Size of libQt5Core.so.5.3.0

Re: [Development] Qt binaries with inlined functions

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Qt binaries with inlined functions > > > > Hello all, > > I'd like to start a discussion about .https://bugreports.qt- > project.org/browse/QTBUG-32995. Please share you

Re: [Development] Qt 5.3 header diff: QtCore

> -Original Message- > [...] > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > These two change combined trigger QTBUG-37283: it's now not possible to > use qCDebug(cat) on a compiler w/o variadic macros, where cat is a function > that returns a QLoggingCategory subclass.

Re: [Development] utf-8 BOM and parsers

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: Monday, April 14, 2014 7:34 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] utf-8

Re: [Development] Categorized logging inside Qt

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Frederik Gladhorn > Sent: Thursday, April 10, 2014 7:21 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Categ

Re: [Development] HEADS UP: Qt 5.3.0 - merge stable into release

> -Original Message- > From: development-bounces+kai.koehne=digia@qt-project.org > [...] > As per Qt Commit Policy #11, fixes should be "submit[ted] against the lowest > applicable branch from which a release is still planned." > > That's what I've been doing here. Or are you saying

Re: [Development] [Interest] Executing PowerShell command with quotes using QProcess

> -Original Message- > [...] > it's not windows-only. > the quoting mechanism is inspired by how *some* windows applications > interpret quoting. but it is generally speaking just stupid. > when i finally get to it, i want to deprecate this custom single-string mode > in > favor of accep

Re: [Development] One 'qt' branch to rule 'em all!

koehne=digia@qt-project.org] On > Behalf Of Koehne Kai > Sent: Tuesday, April 01, 2014 1:12 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] One 'qt' branch to rule 'em all! > > Hi, > > We've had now different setups with git branches - in Qt 4 w

  1   2   3   >