Re: [Development] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: Removing Qt 3D from release configuration in dev branch

2024-04-08 Thread Mark De Wit
Hi everyone, Also a Qt3D user here, and I would like to echo Harald’s sentiments– and a big thanks to Harald for saying my thoughts out loud. I had already privately tried to communicate my thoughts to Tuukka on this subject, but here is my public take… As the Qt champion inside my

Re: [Development] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: Qt3D RHI render plugin status?

2022-11-30 Thread Mark De Wit
Hi Mike, You're absolutely right, somehow I missed that... 6.4.1 renderer appears to work again, once 6.4.2 fixes the font issues I'll give it a thorough test. Thanks! Mark -Original Message- From: Mike Krus Sent: 30 November 2022 11:24 To: Mark De Wit Cc: development@qt

[Development] Qt3D RHI render plugin status?

2022-11-30 Thread Mark De Wit
Dear Qt devs, I have a Qt 3D application that relies on the RHI render plugin, and is stuck on Qt 6.1.x due to the GPL licensing issue for Qt6ShaderTools.dll. Now that Qt6ShaderTools has been relicensed to LGPL in June of this year, will the RHI render plugin be re-instated in the default

Re: [Development] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Could support for C be added to Qt?

2022-09-13 Thread Mark De Wit
ownership and destruction, generating all the necessary template instances, etc. Of course no modern solution would follow the SWIG approach of writing your own C++ parser, but for what it is, it works pretty well. Mark From: samuel ammonius Sent: 12 September 2022 21:44 To: Mark De Wit ; development

Re: [Development] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: Repository request: playground/qtscrypt

2022-09-01 Thread Mark De Wit
This sounds like QPyBind11 to me? Mark -Original Message- From: Development On Behalf Of Cristián Maureira-Fredes Sent: 31 August 2022 23:33 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: [EXTERNAL EMAIL] Re: [Development] Repository request: playground/qtscrypt On 8/31/22 21:33, Konrad

Re: [Development] [EXTERNAL EMAIL] cmake targets for plugins are still not working (QTBUG-89643)

2021-05-27 Thread Mark De Wit
Note, I've been informed on that bug that shared and static builds require different fixes and therefore created a new bug report QTBUG-94066 for fixing the shared / official installs versions. Thank, Mark From: Development On Behalf Of Mark De Wit Sent: 27 May 2021 17:50 To: Development@qt

[Development] cmake targets for plugins are still not working (QTBUG-89643)

2021-05-27 Thread Mark De Wit
I'd like to flag up bug report https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-89643 which is closed as fixed in Qt 6.1.0 but is still (or again) broken in Qt 6.1.1 I added a comment to the Bug, but in my testing, the Qt6 Gui module does not load its plugin as part of its cmake processing, and CMake thus

Re: [Development] Qt 5.13 & 5.14 add device-independent pixels to device-dependent

2020-03-27 Thread Mark De Wit
> From: Development On Behalf Of > Morten Sørvig > Sent: 18 February 2020 13:38 > To: Qt development mailing list > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.13 & 5.14 add device-independent pixels to > device-dependent > > > On 14 Feb 2020, at 21:46, Thiago Macieira > wrote: > > > > On Friday, 14

Re: [Development] How to perform unattended installations of Qt? (Was: Changes to Qt offering)

2020-02-17 Thread Mark De Wit
> From: Development On Behalf Of Sze > Howe Koh > > Another use case: Mass deployment to multiple PCs: > https://forum.qt.io/topic/111587/classroom-deployment-of-qt-for-multiple- > pcs-and-for-all-users-windows > This mass-deployment is the use case that concerns me most of all. I have 45

Re: [Development] [Releasing] HEADS-UP: Qt 5.15 Feature Freeze is in effect now

2020-02-07 Thread Mark De Wit
> Edward Welbourne > > Alexander Akulich (6 February 2020 16:33) asked: > > Are we going to provide some Qt5 → Qt6 migration tool? > > https://codereview.qt-project.org/c/qt/qtrepotools/+/289121 > > > It is trivial to grep the sources for > > "SIGNAL(error(QAbstractSocket::SocketError))" and

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

2020-01-31 Thread Mark De Wit
: Tino Pyssysalo > Sent: 31 January 2020 09:32 > To: Mark De Wit ; Qt development mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering > > The problem must be somewhere else. There are no installer changes in > production yet. > -- > Tino Pyssy

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

2020-01-31 Thread Mark De Wit
developers in this company to create Qt accounts, that's a non-starter... Mark > -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Mark De Wit > Sent: 28 January 2020 11:38 > To: Lars Knoll ; Qt development mailing list > > Subject: Re: [Development] C

Re: [Development] Changes to Qt offering

2020-01-28 Thread Mark De Wit
I've been working really hard over the past few years to get Qt used more within my organisation. However, mandating that our 45 developers all register Qt accounts is a complete non-starter, especially if only 2 or 3 of them actually work with UI on a day-to-day basis. For the rest of them,

Re: [Development] Updated high-DPI support for Qt 5.14

2019-10-03 Thread Mark De Wit
Is there a chance that the high-dpi work will fix the dpi-awareness of the Fusion theme as reported in https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-74100 ? Last time I checked there was a fair amount of drawing code that didn't check what screen a widget was on, and hence used "global" scaling (if

Re: [Development] Proposing CMake as build tool for Qt 6

2019-06-17 Thread Mark De Wit
> -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of > Konstantin Tokarev > Sent: 06 June 2019 14:30 > To: Simon Hausmann ; Bogdan Vatra > ; development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Proposing CMake as build tool for Qt 6 > > > > 06.06.2019, 16:25, "Simon Hausmann" : > >

Re: [Development] Adding more Datetime classes to Qt

2019-04-10 Thread Mark De Wit
> From: Development On Behalf Of > Thiago Macieira > > On Tuesday, 9 April 2019 05:11:03 PDT Pouya Shahinfar wrote: > > You open a project which is developed by someone else, and he/she used > > QDateTime for holding time and date. The problem here is you as a > > newcomer to project do not know

Re: [Development] What to expect from QIcon/the icon engine on screen changes

2019-04-09 Thread Mark De Wit
Interesting find - that fix might have solved my issue with Fusion theme as well. From the looks of it, QWindow* support was added to some theme code since that bug report, but not consistently for all controls and all themes. It would have been great to fix this at the QIcon level rather

Re: [Development] What to expect from QIcon/the icon engine on screen changes

2019-04-08 Thread Mark De Wit
Are you using Fusion theme by any chance? I'm facing the same issue, I even tried writing my own Icon Engine to try and improve matters, but turns out widgets are simply requesting the wrong size icon - nothing the icon engine can do to "second-guess" such requests... I have filed one such

Re: [Development] Does iMX6 support EGL on X11 feature?

2019-03-25 Thread Mark De Wit
I’ve had a good experience adding KPlotWidget into my application for simple line plots. It’s simple and easily to modify if required. https://github.com/KDE/kplotting Mark From: Development On Behalf Of Denis Shienkov Sent: 23 March 2019 07:57 To: Alexander Nassian Cc:

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.12' to '5.12.1' started

2019-02-01 Thread Mark De Wit
alpha for another data point. Mark -Original Message- From: Jani Heikkinen Sent: 01 February 2019 09:53 To: Mark De Wit ; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.12' to '5.12.1' started Hi! This is sadly to hear. Please report all findings

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.12' to '5.12.1' started

2019-02-01 Thread Mark De Wit
-Original Message- From: Development On Behalf Of Mark De Wit Sent: 30 January 2019 11:45 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.12' to '5.12.1' started Good point. I only just now saw & read the entire tooltip for WebEngine. I a

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.12' to '5.12.1' started

2019-01-30 Thread Mark De Wit
Subject: Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.12' to '5.12.1' started This suggestion is already in JIRA see https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-71579 Br Michal On 01/30/2019 11:29 AM, Kai Koehne wrote: >> -Original Message- >> From: Development On Behalf Of >>

Re: [Development] HEADS-UP: Branching from '5.12' to '5.12.1' started

2019-01-30 Thread Mark De Wit
Selecting MSVC 2015 64-bit + Qt WebEngine for 5.12.1 in the installer does not give me WebEngine. Is that intentional? Should the installer perhaps warn that the selected combination is unsupported? I shall try again with MSVC 2017... KR, Mark -Original Message- From: Development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.12 beta2 released

2018-10-17 Thread Mark De Wit
It's great to see a resolution so close... I'll see if I can find time to try the patch locally. Really appreciate the work going into it! Kind regards, Mark -Original Message- From: Michal Klocek Sent: 17 October 2018 09:32 To: Mark De Wit ; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re

Re: [Development] Qt 5.12 beta2 released

2018-10-17 Thread Mark De Wit
What is the criteria for blocker? It would be great if WebEngine were usable again for people behind proxies (my last usable Qt release is 5.9)... https://bugreports.qt.io/browse/QTBUG-69281 is marked as P1 but not targeted at 5.12? Kind regards, Mark -Original Message- From:

Re: [Development] Relocating a Qt compilation

2018-06-28 Thread Mark De Wit
A qt.conf file could also help point to correct locations. It doesn't have to be absolute, it can be relative? This is how we deal with the hard-coded paths. Mark -Original Message- From: Development On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: 28 June 2018 15:58 To:

Re: [Development] A new approach for Qt main()

2016-12-12 Thread Mark De Wit
I have an application based on qt-solutions qtwinmigrate sample. Because we're integrating Qt into an existing MFC application, we're not even running QApplication exec. The application uses MFC's entry point for startup and drives the Qt event loop manually as part of the MFC event loop.

Re: [Development] -developer-build (was: [5.7-beta] compile error with xcode-6.4

2016-05-04 Thread Mark De Wit
7:43 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] -developer-build (was: [5.7-beta] compile error with xcode-6.4 On quarta-feira, 4 de maio de 2016 07:46:41 PDT Mark De Wit wrote: > The configure flags are poorly documented, and options like qtlibinfix > (which I understood to be a recomm

Re: [Development] -developer-build (was: [5.7-beta] compile error with xcode-6.4

2016-05-04 Thread Mark De Wit
Having tried to do this myself last week, I cannot find any "official" documentation on how to build Qt myself for an official release with our software. Doing our own build has proven frustrating enough that we abandoned the current attempt to update our version of Qt. The configure flags

Re: [Development] High-DPI on Win

2015-12-29 Thread Mark De Wit
Keep in mind that from Windows 8.1 onwards, DPI can be set per-screen (I myself have a 4K screen (240 dpi, 250% scaling) + regular HD screen (120 dpi, 125% scaling)). Qt appears to already handle the appropriate new dpi-aware APIs (Qt defaults to per-monitor DPI aware on Windows 8.1+). Sadly,

Re: [Development] High-DPI on Win

2015-12-29 Thread Mark De Wit
transform to make them scale to 250%. Mark -Original Message- From: Development [mailto:development-boun...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira Sent: 29 December 2015 12:19 To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] High-DPI on Win On Tuesday 29 December 2015 09:45:

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

2015-12-04 Thread Mark De Wit
2015, Mark De Wit escribió: > Building from source would be an option, I guess. We have done it in > the past, but the build process / flags (for distribution) is not > sufficiently well documented, and starting with 5.5.1 we were excited > to be able to use official binaries. When

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

2015-12-04 Thread Mark De Wit
2015 13:31 To: Shaw Andy <andy.s...@theqtcompany.com> Cc: Mark De Wit <mark.de...@iesve.com>; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries On Dec 3, 2015, at 8:31 AM, Shaw Andy <andy.s...@theqtcompany.co

Re: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries

2015-12-03 Thread Mark De Wit
regards, Mark From: Turunen Tuukka [mailto:tuukka.turu...@theqtcompany.com] Sent: 03 December 2015 12:30 To: Mark De Wit <mark.de...@iesve.com>; development@qt-project.org Subject: RE: [Development] Please do not remove QtWebkit from 5.6 official binaries Hi Mark, If you need to use Qt