Technically it sounds good to me. But would it be consistent with the
responsibility of QMetaObject? It doesn't use any metadata from the object
passed, unlike the other overloads.
On Sep 25, 2014 3:14 PM, "Olivier Goffart" wrote:
> On Saturday 20 September 2014 12:41:07
But say, if I want to submit this as part of QtCore, doesn't that package
use one consistent license which I'll have to use?
On Sep 24, 2014 3:05 PM, "Tomasz Siekierda" wrote:
> On 24 September 2014 11:34, Sune Vuorela wrote:
> > On 2014-09-24, Yam Marcovic wrot
l, personally.
> However, when I looked at the repo I couldn't see any license information,
> and I'm wondering what license you're planning on releasing it under.
>
> Cheers,
> Chris.
>
>
> https://www.qinetic.com.au/ - Qt And QML User Experience Specialists
he code with much success.
Please let me know if you think this could help the Qt project as a
built-in class.
With best wishes,
Yam Marcovic
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development
