Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-28 Thread Richard Gerd Kuesters
Hi all. Sorry for dragging this subject again, but here we go. A couple of things got me thinking about the WebSocket implementation: 1. Almost (if not all) web browser network interactions (HTTP, FTP (limited), file) are created by QNetworkAccessManager - which also provides proxy configurati

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-27 Thread Juergen Bocklage-Ryannel
On 14.08.13 5:54 PM, Kurt Pattyn wrote: > Hi, > > I opensourced a Qt based module that implements the web socket protocol. The > repository can be found here: https://github.com/KurtPattyn/QWebSockets. > I have 2 questions: > 1. Is there any interest in adding this to Qt? +1 I'm very interested. I

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-24 Thread Shane Kearns
structure is more than welcome! > > On 21 Aug 2013, at 04:11, development-requ...@qt-project.org wrote: > > *From: *Shane Kearns > *Subject: **Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets* > *Date: *21 Aug 2013 00:09:52 GMT+02:00 > *To: *Kurt Pattyn > *Cc: *"developme

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-21 Thread Kurt Pattyn
a look at the Qt serial port add-on, as you suggested. As this is my first contribution to Qt, all help regarding the build infrastructure is more than welcome! On 21 Aug 2013, at 04:11, development-requ...@qt-project.org wrote: > From: Shane Kearns > Subject: Re: [Development] [Feature

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-20 Thread Shane Kearns
Hi, I would also make it an addon for now. There is one reason why it would need to go in QtNetwork, and that is to allow upgrading a QNetworkRequest/QNetworkReply into a QWebSocket. That would be a complex feature to implement, and isn't required to use websockets. I believe that a QML/javascrip

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-19 Thread Christian Gagneraud
On 18/08/13 05:08, Matt Broadstone wrote: > On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Kurt Pattyn > wrote: > > Well, > > it is a fact that Qt has little to no native support for 'cloud' > based client and server 'protocols', like REST, WebSockets, SOAP, > aso.

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-17 Thread Matt Broadstone
On Sat, Aug 17, 2013 at 4:17 AM, Kurt Pattyn wrote: > Well, > > it is a fact that Qt has little to no native support for 'cloud' based > client and server 'protocols', like REST, WebSockets, SOAP, aso. So, it > would indeed be a nice addition to have support for the most popular > 'protocols'. >

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-17 Thread Denis Shienkov
Hi all. > I prefer the latter but the classes should at least have some consistent API. This concept it is possible to expand and enter the general base class or pattern of Protocol (or something like Protocols framework, by analogy with QStateMachine framework). This class (or set of classe

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-17 Thread Kurt Pattyn
Well, it is a fact that Qt has little to no native support for 'cloud' based client and server 'protocols', like REST, WebSockets, SOAP, aso. So, it would indeed be a nice addition to have support for the most popular 'protocols'. Should we have something like a QNetworkAccessManager with plugga

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-16 Thread Matt Broadstone
On Thu, Aug 15, 2013 at 6:59 PM, Christian Gagneraud wrote: > On 16/08/13 03:41, Matt Broadstone wrote: > > On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Kurt Pattyn > > wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > I opensourced a Qt based module that implements the web socket > > pr

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-16 Thread liuyanghejerry
ss. Regarding add-on or not, I let Shane decide what seems most feasible. Best regards, Kurt On 15 Aug 2013, at 05:44, development-requ...@qt-project.org <mailto:development-requ...@qt-project.org> wrote: *From:*liuyanghejerry <mailto:liuyangheje...@126.com>> *Subject:**Re:

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-15 Thread Matt Broadstone
On Wed, Aug 14, 2013 at 11:54 AM, Kurt Pattyn wrote: > Hi, > > I opensourced a Qt based module that implements the web socket protocol. > The repository can be found here: > https://github.com/KurtPattyn/QWebSockets. > I have 2 questions: > 1. Is there any interest in adding this to Qt? > 2. If s

[Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-15 Thread Kurt Pattyn
pment-requ...@qt-project.org wrote: > From: liuyanghejerry > Subject: Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets > Date: 15 Aug 2013 03:09:03 GMT+02:00 > To: development@qt-project.org > > > Well, I'm interested in websocket. Since websocket has been one of the most

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-14 Thread liuyanghejerry
Well, I'm interested in websocket. Since websocket has been one of the most popular protocols among internet, espcially in real-time based websites. It's good to see it in Qt, no matter as add-on or directly in the source. But in my own opinion, add-on may loss support during version bump of

Re: [Development] [Feature Request] Websockets

2013-08-14 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quinta-feira, 15 de agosto de 2013 02:20:34, Kurt Pattyn wrote: > BTW: I only received 2 responses to this mail: does that mean, this is not > important enough to be considered for inclusion? I am a bit confused about > how to proceed. Do I just dump the code into gitorious, and wait for > react