.org
> Subject: Re: [Development] A better headersclean test
>
> On Tuesday 06 January 2015 10:14:35 Curtis Mitch wrote:
> > > For development I usually do debug builds, so it would be nice to
> avoid
> > > the extra build time (and extra nagging during the build) most
On Jan 6, 2015, at 16:52, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Tuesday 06 January 2015 10:14:35 Curtis Mitch wrote:
>>> For development I usually do debug builds, so it would be nice to avoid
>>> the extra build time (and extra nagging during the build) most of the
>>> time, and just let CI enforce it, a
On Tuesday 06 January 2015 10:14:35 Curtis Mitch wrote:
> > For development I usually do debug builds, so it would be nice to avoid
> > the extra build time (and extra nagging during the build) most of the
> > time, and just let CI enforce it, as long as that is reliable.
> +1
So I guess both of y
> For development I usually do debug builds, so it would be nice to avoid the
> extra build time (and extra nagging during the build) most of the time, and
> just let CI enforce it, as long as that is reliable.
+1
___
Development mailing list
Developm
On 6 Jan 2015, at 01:06, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2015 23:15:24 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
>> Il 02/01/2015 17:55, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
>>> I'm giving it another week due to the Christmas/New Years break, after
>>> that I will consider it ML consensus to enable by defau
On Monday 05 January 2015 23:15:24 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> Il 02/01/2015 17:55, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
> > I'm giving it another week due to the Christmas/New Years break, after
> > that I will consider it ML consensus to enable by default.
>
> Can we make it opt-in instead of opt-out? I d
On Monday 05 January 2015 14:27:20 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Monday 05 January 2015 15:27:24 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
wrote:
> > ACKing that I do not do developer-build for Debian (because "we don't need
> > it" [0]) and that my opinion should not have much weight if any, I do
> > al
On Monday 05 January 2015 15:27:24 Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote:
> ACKing that I do not do developer-build for Debian (because "we don't need
> it" [0]) and that my opinion should not have much weight if any, I do also
> think Thiago's idea is a nice one. I do also consider having hea
Il 02/01/2015 17:55, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
I'm giving it another week due to the Christmas/New Years break, after that I
will consider it ML consensus to enable by default.
Can we make it opt-in instead of opt-out? I don't see why all Qt
developers should pay by default for the extra com
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 19:57:47 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I've previously mentioned this, but I can't find the link in the archives.
>
> I've implemented a better headersclean check that can't be forgotten. You
> can find it at https://codereview.qt-project.org/45533
>
> This
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 19:57:47 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> The reason I am asking for this is because having our own headers be clean
> of
> warnings is a feature. And just like our binary compatibility guarantees, it
> should be tested and enforced in the CI, which in turn requires everyone t
On Thursday 18 December 2014 13:53:38 Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
> Il 18/12/2014 04:57, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
> > Drawback:
> > It increases the build time considerably (25 to 33%) due to having a lot
> > more files to compile, and always without PCH.
>
> Are those files part of the tests? I.e
Il 18/12/2014 04:57, Thiago Macieira ha scritto:
Drawback:
It increases the build time considerably (25 to 33%) due to having a lot more
files to compile, and always without PCH.
Are those files part of the tests? I.e. -developer-build -nomake tests
should not have any performance drawback?
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 19:57:47 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Hello all
>
> I've previously mentioned this, but I can't find the link in the archives.
>
> I've implemented a better headersclean check that can't be forgotten. You
> can find it at https://codereview.qt-project.org/45533
>
> This
Hello all
I've previously mentioned this, but I can't find the link in the archives.
I've implemented a better headersclean check that can't be forgotten. You can
find it at https://codereview.qt-project.org/45533
This email is to ask for when it should be enabled: Lars and Ossi in the mail
di
15 matches
Mail list logo
