Re: [Development] A simple analysis of apps using qtbase's private headers

2016-02-02 Thread Sune Vuorela
On 2016-02-02, Liang Qi wrote: > Above three are not applications, they must be input context plugin of Qt, > just like ibus in > https://github.com/qtproject/qtbase/tree/5.5/src/plugins/platforminputconte= > xts/ibus > . Normally every input method software could/should

Re: [Development] A simple analysis of apps using qtbase's private headers

2016-02-02 Thread Liang Qi
On 22 January 2016 at 04:15, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez < perezme...@gmail.com> wrote: > The following three have something in common: they are all apps coded for > Chinese people. I've been told that they need QPA's private stuff in order > to > have proper input systems, but I haven't

[Development] A simple analysis of apps using qtbase's private headers

2016-01-21 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
I did a **very** simple analysis of apps packaged in Debian using qtbase's private headers. My main concern was to see if we (Debian) can avoid having to rebuild them every time we push a new version of Qt to our archive. What I've found seemed interesting so I decided to share it here. The