On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 1:55:41 PM CET Allan Jensen wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 13:38:46 CET Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> > On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 11:48:40 AM CET Allan Jensen wrote:
> > > On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 11:19:07 CET Edward Welbourne wrote:
> > > > Jedrzej
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 13:38:46 CET Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 11:48:40 AM CET Allan Jensen wrote:
>
> > On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 11:19:07 CET Edward Welbourne wrote:
> >
> > > Jedrzej Nowacki (30 January 2019 11:08)
> > >
> > >
> > > > Mårten pointed
On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 11:48:40 AM CET Allan Jensen wrote:
> On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 11:19:07 CET Edward Welbourne wrote:
> > Jedrzej Nowacki (30 January 2019 11:08)
> >
> > > Mårten pointed out that we can check for conflicts up front. Not only
> > > against HEAD of the target
On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 11:19:07 AM CET Edward Welbourne wrote:
> > Mårten pointed out that we can check for conflicts up front. Not only
> > against HEAD of the target branch, but also against all build branches.
> > That is even nicer as there is no need to start a job that would likely
>
On Wednesday, 30 January 2019 11:19:07 CET Edward Welbourne wrote:
> Jedrzej Nowacki (30 January 2019 11:08)
>
> > Mårten pointed out that we can check for conflicts up front. Not only
> > against HEAD of the target branch, but also against all build branches.
> > That is even nicer as there is
Jedrzej Nowacki (30 January 2019 11:08)
> Mårten pointed out that we can check for conflicts up front. Not only against
> HEAD of the target branch, but also against all build branches. That is even
> nicer as there is no need to start a job that would likely to be rejected at
> the end.
That'll
On Wednesday, January 30, 2019 10:41:02 AM CET Jedrzej Nowacki wrote:
> Cheap (a.k.a reasonably fast to implement) proposal:
> - Stage button would create a stage branch as currently (through cherry-pick
>
on top of target branch)
> - 3-5 minutes old stage branch would changed to be a build
On Friday, January 25, 2019 11:08:52 AM CET Lars Knoll wrote:
> To me this means we need to seriously rethink that part of our CI system,
> and ideally test changes (or patch series) individually and in parallel. So
> maybe we should adjust our CI system that way:
>
> * test changes (or patch
