On 8 Oct 2012, at 14:58, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Friday, September 21, 2012 05:24:16 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On sexta-feira, 21 de setembro de 2012 16.47.11, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>> Include the major version number (5) in all library base names, like on
>>> Windows, on all platforms.
On 9/10/12 5:17 PM, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> On Tuesday, October 09, 2012 09:07:10 AM Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
>> On 08/10/12 22:58, Simon Hausmann wrote:
>>> Now this has some ugly implications, everyone will have to change the way
>>> they develop with Qt 5. In this context we have another interestin
On Tuesday, October 09, 2012 09:07:10 AM Lincoln Ramsay wrote:
> On 08/10/12 22:58, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> > Now this has some ugly implications, everyone will have to change the way
> > they develop with Qt 5. In this context we have another interesting
> > artifact: People who have been developi
On 08/10/12 22:58, Simon Hausmann wrote:
> Now this has some ugly implications, everyone will have to change the way they
> develop with Qt 5. In this context we have another interesting artifact:
> People who have been developing Qt for a long time as part of company efforts
> such as Trolltech, N
On Monday, October 08, 2012 02:31:46 PM shane.kea...@accenture.com wrote:
[...]
> Another thing you need to consider is named versions.
> For example I might have "5.0.0" and "5.0.0-blackberry" co-installed.
> I think Qt Creator handles this just fine, but the "qt --5" examples above
> look like it
> We just had a discussion in the Oslo office about this. We suggest to
> basically follow your proposal, with an addon to hide some of the
> uglyness it brings along.
>
> Let me try to summarize very shortly. The base proposal would be to
> include the major Qt version throughout the project:
>
>
On Friday, September 21, 2012 05:24:16 PM Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 21 de setembro de 2012 16.47.11, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Include the major version number (5) in all library base names, like on
> > Windows, on all platforms. On Windows we already have QtCore5.dll and
> > QtV85.
On 24 Sep 2012, at 11:30, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 24 de setembro de 2012 09.14.27, Ziller Eike wrote:
>>> Let me ask you a question, though: suppose someone installs Qt 5 globally
>>> as frameworks (/System/Frameworks/QtCore.framework), then updates Qt 4.8.
>>> Which is the de
On segunda-feira, 24 de setembro de 2012 09.14.27, Ziller Eike wrote:
> > Let me ask you a question, though: suppose someone installs Qt 5 globally
> > as frameworks (/System/Frameworks/QtCore.framework), then updates Qt 4.8.
> > Which is the default symlink target?
>
> There is no "default symlink
On 24 Sep 2012, at 09:49, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 24 de setembro de 2012 07.19.30, Ziller Eike wrote:
>> I don't think the recommendation applies to Mac.
>>
>> Usually you won't have globally installed Qt. Most applications deploy their
>> used libraries within the applicatio
On segunda-feira, 24 de setembro de 2012 07.19.30, Ziller Eike wrote:
> I don't think the recommendation applies to Mac.
>
> Usually you won't have globally installed Qt. Most applications deploy their
> used libraries within the application's app bundle (that's what we have
> macdeployqt for). Eve
On 21 Sep 2012, at 17:24, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 21 de setembro de 2012 16.47.11, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> Include the major version number (5) in all library base names, like on
>> Windows, on all platforms. On Windows we already have QtCore5.dll and
>> QtV85.dll, so I reco
On sexta-feira, 21 de setembro de 2012 17.24.16, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Good examples are: qtcreator, assistant, linguist, qmlviewer, qmlscene,
> qmlplugindump, qmlprofiler, xmlpatterns, qdbus, qdbusviewer, qglinfo
Actually, the qml ones are not good examples since they can load plugins.
On sexta-feira, 21 de setembro de 2012 16.47.11, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Include the major version number (5) in all library base names, like on
> Windows, on all platforms. On Windows we already have QtCore5.dll and
> QtV85.dll, so I recommend having libQtCore5.so.5. For Mac, I'm not sure of
> th
14 matches
Mail list logo
