Hi,
On Friday, October 26, 2012 19:10:15 Stephen Kelly wrote:
QtBluetooth uses a namespace for public APIs, but QtLocation does not, for
example.
The qtconnectivity repo will likely be part of Qt 5.2, but it is still not
consistent - it uses a QtBluetooth and QtNfc. Both namespaces should be
On Wednesday, September 04, 2013 07:04:32 you wrote:
Hi,
On Friday, October 26, 2012 19:10:15 Stephen Kelly wrote:
QtBluetooth uses a namespace for public APIs, but QtLocation does not, for
example.
The qtconnectivity repo will likely be part of Qt 5.2, but it is still not
consistent -
On Friday, October 26, 2012 19:10:15 Stephen Kelly wrote:
QtBluetooth uses a namespace for public APIs, but QtLocation does not, for
example.
Hello Sze-Howe,
The qtconnectivity repo will likely be part of Qt 5.2, but it is still not
consistent - it uses a QtBluetooth and QtNfc. Both
Hi,
I don't know about QtJsonDb but QtPim has a few people interested in it
(Jolla for one, and Canonical for another). At the moment, development
resources dedicated to improving it are somewhat limited, but that
situation will change. If there's anything in particular which you think
needs
On Tue, Oct 30, 2012 at 7:45 PM, Sze Howe Koh szehowe@gmail.com wrote:
I'll begin cleaning up the selected Qt 5.0 modules first, then move on
to the others later.
The renaming of QtMultimedia and QtMultimedia::MetaData has been
submitted for review:
On Mon, Oct 29, 2012 at 5:45 PM, Knoll Lars lars.kn...@digia.com wrote:
- QDoc loses all ability to differentiate between modules and namespaces
In principle that's fixable in qdoc. If we were to start from scratch, I
think QtNamespace would be more consistent, as it's the same as the module
On Sunday, October 28, 2012 00:08:21 Sze Howe Koh wrote:
//=
// Analysis and conclusion
//=
Proposal 2 has more pros and fewer cons than Proposal 1. Proposal 1's
strength is also present in Proposal 2, and Proposal 2's weakness
On Oct 27, 2012, at 6:08 PM, Sze Howe Koh szehowe@gmail.com wrote:
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com wrote:
I think this is a good initiative. See also
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,37727
which is a move in the opposite direction.
On Sat, Oct 27, 2012 at 1:10 AM, Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com wrote:
I think this is a good initiative. See also
https://codereview.qt-project.org/#change,37727
which is a move in the opposite direction.
Thanks for replying, and for the heads-up; I wasn't aware of Lars'
initiative
Hi all,
The first proposed change has been submitted to Gerrit, to give QSql its
own camel-case header: https://codereview.qt-project.org/38294
Does anyone have any objections/suggestions for the rest of this plan? If
not, I'll start working on the next part: Renaming some namespaces that
were
On Friday, October 26, 2012 23:34:32 Sze Howe Koh wrote:
Hi all,
The first proposed change has been submitted to Gerrit, to give QSql its
own camel-case header: https://codereview.qt-project.org/38294
Does anyone have any objections/suggestions for the rest of this plan? If
not, I'll
On Friday, October 26, 2012 19:10:15 Stephen Kelly wrote:
former Qt 5
Oops. I meant former Qt 4 here.
--
Stephen Kelly stephen.ke...@kdab.com | Software Engineer
KDAB (Deutschland) GmbH Co.KG, a KDAB Group Company
www.kdab.com || Germany +49-30-521325470 || Sweden (HQ) +46-563-540090
KDAB -
12 matches
Mail list logo
