Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2018-01-08 Thread Alex Blasche
FYI As per https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/205305/ MSVC2013 is no longer in the CI. -- Alex ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-12-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
On quarta-feira, 20 de dezembro de 2017 06:49:40 PST Ville Voutilainen wrote: > Sounds good, +1, good riddance. +1 With the drop of QNX 6.6, we'll finally be C++11 core language feature- complete, only ~7 years after it came out. Fortunately, those numbers seem to be coming down. We should be

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-12-20 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 20 December 2017 at 16:17, Lars Knoll wrote: > Hi all, > > here are the promised numbers: > *Version* > *Compiler* > *Commercial* > > *Version* > *Compiler* > *Opensource* > 5.10.0 > MinGW530 > 22 % > > 5.10.0 > MinGW530 > 25 % > 5.10.0 > MSVC2013_64 > 14 % > > 5.10.0 >

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-12-20 Thread Lars Knoll
Hi all, here are the promised numbers: Version Compiler Commercial Version Compiler Opensource 5.10.0 MinGW530 22 % 5.10.0 MinGW530 25 % 5.10.0 MSVC2013_64 14 % 5.10.0 MSVC2013_64 15 % 5.10.0 MSVC2015 20 % 5.10.0 MSVC2015 18 % 5.10.0 MSVC2015_64 20 % 5.10.0 MSVC2015_64

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-12-18 Thread Tuukka Turunen
Hi, Akseli will check the percentages from Qt 5.10 online installer later this week. Yours, Tuukka On 16/12/2017, 18.25, "Development on behalf of Thiago Macieira" wrote: On

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-12-16 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Wednesday, 8 November 2017 10:57:32 PST Alex Blasche wrote: > Sorry, no. As mentioned during the contributor summit, this decision is > tabled until we have the 5.10 download figures. Any numbers now? -- Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com Software Architect - Intel Open

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-11-08 Thread Jedrzej Nowacki
lasche <alexander.blas...@qt.io> Sent: Wednesday, November 8, 2017 7:57:32 PM To: Shawn Rutledge; Jani Heikkinen Cc: Thiago Macieira; development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013 >From: Shawn Rutledge <shawn.rutle...@qt.io> >> On 18 Oct 201

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-11-08 Thread Alex Blasche
>From: Shawn Rutledge >> On 18 Oct 2017, at 07:34, Jani Heikkinen wrote: >> We discussed about this last spring and then the decision was that 5.10 is >> too early but 5.11 might be possible. > So can we get that done soon on dev branch? Sorry, no.

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-11-07 Thread Shawn Rutledge
Jani > >> -Original Message- >> From: Development [mailto:development- >> bounces+jani.heikkinen=qt...@qt-project.org] On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira >> Sent: keskiviikko 18. lokakuuta 2017 7.51 >> To: development@qt-project.org >> Subject: [Development

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-10-18 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 17 October 2017 23:35:17 PDT Lars Knoll wrote: > Since you need the patch to work on 5.10, I think we’ll need a workaround > for VS2013. Ok. Working around the lack of unrestricted unions is easy. But I will need to perform a more complete test tomorrow to see if it compiles and

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-10-18 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 18 Oct 2017, at 07:43, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On Tuesday, 17 October 2017 22:25:34 PDT Philippe wrote: >>> We were. I'm asking for a quicker decision now, to decide whether I need >>> to >>> invest time making QRandomGenerator deterministic mode work on MSVC

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-10-17 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 17 October 2017 22:25:34 PDT Philippe wrote: > > We were. I'm asking for a quicker decision now, to decide whether I need > > to > > invest time making QRandomGenerator deterministic mode work on MSVC 2013. > > Did you consider having a policy such as "Feature X is only available >

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-10-17 Thread Jani Heikkinen
keskiviikko 18. lokakuuta 2017 7.51 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013 > > This came up again in QtCS and we decided that dropping it soon is probably a > good idea, especially after Qt 5.9 became LTS. > > Did we decide on 5.1

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-10-17 Thread Philippe
> We were. I'm asking for a quicker decision now, to decide whether I need to > invest time making QRandomGenerator deterministic mode work on MSVC 2013. Did you consider having a policy such as "Feature X is only available for compilers that suports Y" ? (to use sparingly, of course) Philippe

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-10-17 Thread Thiago Macieira
On Tuesday, 17 October 2017 21:54:40 PDT Ville Voutilainen wrote: > On 18 October 2017 at 07:51, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > This came up again in QtCS and we decided that dropping it soon is > > probably a good idea, especially after Qt 5.9 became LTS. > > > > Did we

Re: [Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-10-17 Thread Ville Voutilainen
On 18 October 2017 at 07:51, Thiago Macieira wrote: > This came up again in QtCS and we decided that dropping it soon is probably a > good idea, especially after Qt 5.9 became LTS. > > Did we decide on 5.10 or 5.11? > > Because one of my changes for 5.10 is currently

[Development] Dropping of MSVC 2013

2017-10-17 Thread Thiago Macieira
This came up again in QtCS and we decided that dropping it soon is probably a good idea, especially after Qt 5.9 became LTS. Did we decide on 5.10 or 5.11? Because one of my changes for 5.10 is currently failing on MSVC 2013 as designed. I need to refactor it for it to compile there. Do I