Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-18 Thread Daniel Smith
--Original Message- From: Development On Behalf Of Alberto Mardegan Sent: Sunday, October 17, 2021 12:10 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project Hi! I know I'm coming too late with this, but maybe it's something that can be

Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-17 Thread Alberto Mardegan
Hi! I know I'm coming too late with this, but maybe it's something that can be considered as for future developments of the voting bot: On 04/10/21 13:08, Daniel Smith wrote: > If anyone wishes to verify that their personal vote has been recorded > correctly, they can email

Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-15 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 7 Oct 2021, at 10:52, Edward Welbourne wrote: > > Lars Knoll (6 October 2021 15:33) wrote: >> * voting will be open for 7 days to give everybody enough time to react >> * The voting database will be deleted 2 weeks after voting ended > > Suggested revision for the second: > > * The

Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-07 Thread Edward Welbourne
Lars Knoll (6 October 2021 15:33) wrote: > * voting will be open for 7 days to give everybody enough time to react > * The voting database will be deleted 2 weeks after voting ended Suggested revision for the second: * The voting database will be deleted 2 weeks after voting ended, unless the

Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-06 Thread Lars Knoll
There hasn’t been too much feedback on the proposal or the implementation so far. I’ll give it until the weekend, and unless further comments or issues come up, I’ll assume a lazy consensus on the proposal and start looking into taking the system into use next week. There are two additional

Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-05 Thread Paul Wicking
- http://quips-qt-io.herokuapp.com/quip-0002.html > Cheers, > Nick > > -Original Message- > From: Development On Behalf Of Lars Knoll > Sent: Friday, 1 October 2021 8:44 PM > To: Qt development mailing list > Subject: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project >

Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-05 Thread Nicholas Bennett
Lars, Couple of questions: Who is eligible to vote? Is it mandatory? Cheers, Nick -Original Message- From: Development On Behalf Of Lars Knoll Sent: Friday, 1 October 2021 8:44 PM To: Qt development mailing list Subject: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project Hi all

Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-04 Thread Daniel Smith
Message- From: Development On Behalf Of Lorn Potter Sent: Monday, October 4, 2021 11:32 AM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project On 2/10/21 3:43 AM, Lars Knoll wrote: > I’d like to propose that we implement a voting procedure us

Re: [Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-04 Thread Lorn Potter
On 2/10/21 3:43 AM, Lars Knoll wrote: I’d like to propose that we implement a voting procedure using this voting bot. We need it for this one case, but would also benefit from having such a tool in other cases, where the lazy consensus model might not be the best solution. We wouldn’t be

[Development] Formal voting procedure for Qt Project

2021-10-01 Thread Lars Knoll
Hi all, As you might have seen, we had a request for a formal vote of no confidence on an Approver status according to the last paragraph in QUIP-2/How to become an Approver(*) in the recent QBS thread(**). This is the first time we will need such a formal vote, which also means that we so