Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web?

2017-06-05 Thread Jason H
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 at 3:26 PM > From: "Lorn Potter" <lorn.pot...@gmail.com> > To: "Jason H" <jh...@gmx.com> > Cc: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web? > > > > On 06/06/2017 12:20 AM

Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web?

2017-06-05 Thread Lorn Potter
On 06/06/2017 12:20 AM, Jason H wrote: > > >> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 at 12:34 AM >> From: "Lorn Potter" <lorn.pot...@gmail.com> >> To: development@qt-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web? >> >> >> >

Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web?

2017-06-05 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
05.06.2017, 17:20, "Jason H" <jh...@gmx.com>: >>  Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 at 12:34 AM >>  From: "Lorn Potter" <lorn.pot...@gmail.com> >>  To: development@qt-project.org >>  Subject: Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web? >

Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web?

2017-06-05 Thread Jason H
> Sent: Monday, June 05, 2017 at 12:34 AM > From: "Lorn Potter" <lorn.pot...@gmail.com> > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web? > > > > On 06/05/2017 07:00 AM, Jason H wrote: > > While Qt is not a we

Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web?

2017-06-05 Thread Sam Segers
Op ma 5 jun. 2017 06:35 schreef Lorn Potter : > > > On 06/05/2017 07:00 AM, Jason H wrote: > > While Qt is not a web framework, over time there have been efforts to > use it on the web (outlined below). > > > > Given that Chrome is dropping NaCL ( >

Re: [Development] Future of Qt on Web?

2017-06-04 Thread Lorn Potter
On 06/05/2017 07:00 AM, Jason H wrote: > While Qt is not a web framework, over time there have been efforts to use it > on the web (outlined below). > > Given that Chrome is dropping NaCL > (http://www.tomshardware.com/news/chrome-deprecates-pnacl-embraces-webassembly,34583.html) > and the