On Fri, 2012-08-31 at 10:07 +0200, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 09.49.35, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
> wrote:
> > Note that for the great majority of the classes this will not be a
> > problem, but we won't know for sure until someone has read the
> > documentation
On sexta-feira, 31 de agosto de 2012 09.49.35, Eskil Abrahamsen Blomfeldt
wrote:
> Note that for the great majority of the classes this will not be a
> problem, but we won't know for sure until someone has read the
> documentation and verified this.
Can you blog about this, so we can crowd-source
On 08/30/2012 03:44 PM, Gladhorn Frederik (Nokia-MP/Oslo) wrote:
> Great stuff :)
>
> Jedrzej and I just started running our qdoc bot, similar to the sanity bot. It
> will post on commits where we suspect new documentation errors to be
> introduces. Let us know when it doesn't work.
> Currently it
Gladhorn Frederik (Nokia-MP/Oslo) wrote on 2012-08-30:
> Hello,
>
> Torsdag 30. august 2012 12.21.40 skrev eskil.abrahamsen-
> blomfe...@nokia.com:
>> Hi,
>>
>> We've started looking at cleaning up the documentation to make it more
>> consistent with the changes made in Qt 5. One big task is han
Hello,
Torsdag 30. august 2012 12.21.40 skrev eskil.abrahamsen-blomfe...@nokia.com:
> Hi,
>
> We've started looking at cleaning up the documentation to make it more
> consistent with the changes made in Qt 5. One big task is handling the
> class reference documentation. Since this was originally
Hi,
We've started looking at cleaning up the documentation to make it more
consistent with the changes made in Qt 5. One big task is handling the class
reference documentation. Since this was originally written when widgets were
the only way to write GUIs in Qt, some of the documentation is rat