On 30/06/2019 10.10, Holger Freyther wrote:
> On 28. Jun 2019, at 00:57, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> In this particular case, Google loves to use Bazel. Everyone else hates that
>> they do.
>>
>> Ask anyone trying to package Tensorflow.
>
> Some Ex-Googlers like it too. It seems there is a disconne
On fredag 28. juni 2019 17:29:29 CEST Mutz, Marc wrote:
>> I don't know whether there's a plugin for that, but a feature that
>> would really benefit a lot of Qt devs would be if Gerrit would
>> understand whether the Merge Conflict is due to a prerequisite commit
>> not having been merged, yet, or
Am 01.07.2019 um 19:57 schrieb André Pönitz:
> On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:43:43PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
and I'll give Gravatar a spin:
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/admin/repos/plugins/avatars-gravata
r
>>
>> It's there, enjoy and put your avatar up at https://grav
On 2.7.2019 15.13, Kari Oikarinen wrote:
>
> On 2.7.2019 14.59, Cristian Adam wrote:
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Development On Behalf Of
>>> Frederik Gladhorn
>>> Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2019 16:11
>>> To: Qt Project Development
On 2.7.2019 14.59, Cristian Adam wrote:
>> -Original Message-
>> From: Development On Behalf Of
>> Frederik Gladhorn
>> Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2019 16:11
>> To: Qt Project Development Mailing-List
>> Subject: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9
&
> -Original Message-
> From: Development On Behalf Of
> Frederik Gladhorn
> Sent: Thursday, 27 June 2019 16:11
> To: Qt Project Development Mailing-List
> Subject: [Development] Moving to Gerrit 2.16.9
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to keep the ball rolling, we pre
On mandag 1. juli 2019 21:23:35 CEST André Hartmann wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I'm not sure if it's related to the gravatars, but Gerrit became
> horrible slow here (this is on a 2MBit DSL line). It's almost unuseable.
>
> Has someone else experienced the same?
Yes, it slowed to a crawl yesterday, we'
Hi all,
I'm not sure if it's related to the gravatars, but Gerrit became
horrible slow here (this is on a 2MBit DSL line). It's almost unuseable.
Has someone else experienced the same?
Regards,
André
Am 01.07.19 um 19:57 schrieb André Pönitz:
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:43:43PM +, Frederik
On Mon, Jul 01, 2019 at 02:43:43PM +, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> > > and I'll give Gravatar a spin:
> > > https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/admin/repos/plugins/avatars-gravata
> > > r
>
> It's there, enjoy and put your avatar up at https://gravatar.com .
I know it's a bit late and it won
And we're on 2.16.9, which brings no huge improvements as far as I can tell.
But it's great to gather some experience and more and more automate the
deployment of new versions. Enjoy!
On torsdag 27. juni 2019 16:53:26 CEST Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
> > On 27 Jun 2019, at 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn
>
On fredag 28. juni 2019 17:29:29 CEST Mutz, Marc wrote:
> On 2019-06-27 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> [...]
>
> > On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new
> > Gerrit,
> > I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to add
> > reviewers
> > based on
> On 28. Jun 2019, at 00:57, Thiago Macieira wrote:
>
> On Thursday, 27 June 2019 08:24:40 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
>> 27.06.2019, 18:12, "Thiago Macieira" :
>>> On Thursday, 27 June 2019 07:10:36 PDT Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Ge
On 2019-06-27 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
[...]
On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new
Gerrit,
I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to add
reviewers
based on git blame
https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/admin/repos/plugins/reviewers
On 27.6.2019 17.53, Tor Arne Vestbø wrote:
>
>
>> On 27 Jun 2019, at 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
>>
>> On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new Gerrit,
>> I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to add reviewers
>> based on git blame
>> htt
On Thursday, 27 June 2019 08:24:40 PDT Konstantin Tokarev wrote:
> 27.06.2019, 18:12, "Thiago Macieira" :
> > On Thursday, 27 June 2019 07:10:36 PDT Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> >> The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit version
> >> seems to only compile with one exact Baze
That’s good news! Thanks for making the upgrades :)
Simon
> On 27. Jun 2019, at 16:15, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Just to keep the ball rolling, we prepared the upgrade to move from Gerrit
> 2.16.7 to 2.16.9. I don't expect any real changes, but it's a good exercise
> for us to st
27.06.2019, 18:12, "Thiago Macieira" :
> On Thursday, 27 June 2019 07:10:36 PDT Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
>> The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit version
>> seems to only compile with one exact Bazel version (roughly).
>
> Argument against home-cooked, not-widely-used
On Thursday, 27 June 2019 07:10:36 PDT Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit version
> seems to only compile with one exact Bazel version (roughly).
Argument against home-cooked, not-widely-used build systems right here.
--
Thiago Macieira - t
> On 27 Jun 2019, at 16:10, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
>
> On a related note, now that things are generally working with the new Gerrit,
> I was wondering if we want to consider plugins. There is one to add reviewers
> based on git blame
> https://gerrit-review.googlesource.com/admin/repos/plug
Hi,
Just to keep the ball rolling, we prepared the upgrade to move from Gerrit
2.16.7 to 2.16.9. I don't expect any real changes, but it's a good exercise
for us to stay up to date and see if the scripting of the upgrade works.
The only real challenge was upgrading Bazel, since every Gerrit vers
20 matches
Mail list logo