Hi there, any suggestion about that ?
Thanks,
--
Sandro
On Wed, Sep 19, 2012 at 3:27 PM, Sandro Andrade sandroandr...@kde.org wrote:
Hi,
I'm developing a qt-based implementation of an OMG specification with
defines a number of
classes in different (nested) namespaces. I'd be nice to have
On quarta-feira, 19 de setembro de 2012 15.27.53, Sandro Andrade wrote:
1) It seems there are no qt modules currently using nested namespaces.
Would that make
my module looks somehow non qt-ish ?
Right.
It'd be nice if we could have a more direct mapping
between spec and implementation.
Hi,
I'm developing a qt-based implementation of an OMG specification with
defines a number of
classes in different (nested) namespaces. I'd be nice to have the
implementation as close as possible
to the spec. For that purpose, headers would be included like:
#include
