On Wednesday 27 January 2016 12:37:36 Knoll Lars wrote:
> >Just to clarify things: does this change affect QtWebKit?
>
> No, only modules that are going to be part of the official Qt 5.7.
And QtWebKit contains 3rd-party code anyway, so we can't change its licensing,
ever.
--
Thiago Macieira -
13.01.2016, 14:15, "Knoll Lars" :
> Hi everybody,
>
> The Qt Company has over the last days signed a new and updated agreement with
> the KDE Free Foundation. With this new agreement come some adjustments to the
> open source licensing of Qt. Basically LGPLv3 will
On 27/01/16 13:34, "Konstantin Tokarev" wrote:
>
>
>13.01.2016, 14:15, "Knoll Lars" :
>> Hi everybody,
>>
>> The Qt Company has over the last days signed a new and updated agreement
>> with the KDE Free Foundation. With this new agreement come
On 14/01/16 08:49, "Development on behalf of Andreas Aardal Hanssen"
wrote:
>2016-01-13 12:15 GMT+01:00 Knoll Lars :
>
>Hi everybody,
>The Qt Company has over the last days signed a new and
Hi everybody,
The Qt Company has over the last days signed a new and updated agreement with
the KDE Free Foundation. With this new agreement come some adjustments to the
open source licensing of Qt. Basically LGPLv3 will in the future be our main
license for frameworks, GPLv3 for the tooling.
2016-01-13 12:15 GMT+01:00 Knoll Lars :
> Hi everybody,
> The Qt Company has over the last days signed a new and updated agreement
> with the KDE Free Foundation. With this new agreement come some adjustments
> to the open source licensing of Qt. Basically LGPLv3 will
Simply wonderful, thanks a lot you all =)
--
"So long, and thanks for all the fish!"
The Hitchhickers guide to the Galaxy
Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
http://perezmeyer.com.ar/
http://perezmeyer.blogspot.com/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.