On 03 Jul 2014, at 17:13, Sune Vuorela nos...@vuorela.dk wrote:
On 2014-07-03, Milian Wolff milian.wo...@kdab.com wrote:
I imagine, it could work by create just a normal library but not install and
public headers, only private ones. That should be OK then, or what do you
think?
We have
On Thursday 03 July 2014 15:13:17 Sune Vuorela wrote:
On 2014-07-03, Milian Wolff milian.wo...@kdab.com wrote:
I imagine, it could work by create just a normal library but not install
and public headers, only private ones. That should be OK then, or what do
you think?
We have too many
Hello,
in my work on QtWebChannel I am hitting a problem. For proper integration into
QtWebKit/QtWebEngine, I need access to the QML API of QWebChannel. I could of
course simply add that to the public interface of the C++ QWebChannel library,
but that sounds ugly and afaik one does not do
On 2014-07-03, Milian Wolff milian.wo...@kdab.com wrote:
I imagine, it could work by create just a normal library but not install and
public headers, only private ones. That should be OK then, or what do you
think?
We have too many private headers already. We should work on getting rid
of
