Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

2017-05-04 Thread Lars Knoll
> On 4 May 2017, at 16:51, Sergio Martins wrote: > > On 2017-05-04 15:18, Thiago Macieira wrote: >> Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:58:53 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev >> escreveu: >>> But we could have Linux clang configuration with clazy plugin. >> Why? Clazy is not part of our development

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

2017-05-04 Thread Sergio Martins
On 2017-05-04 15:18, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:58:53 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: But we could have Linux clang configuration with clazy plugin. Why? Clazy is not part of our development philosophy. We should only do that after there's a QUIP explai

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

2017-05-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 07:34:34 PDT, Sergio Martins escreveu: > On 2017-05-04 14:53, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:23:46 PDT, Heikki Halmet > > > > escreveu: > >> Clang 4: Do we really need this to be tested with Linux in CI? If yes, > >> then

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

2017-05-04 Thread Sergio Martins
On 2017-05-04 14:53, Thiago Macieira wrote: Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:23:46 PDT, Heikki Halmet escreveu: Clang 4: Do we really need this to be tested with Linux in CI? If yes, then which configuration it will be replaced? I don't think we need to. The macOS builds should be su

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

2017-05-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 06:58:53 PDT, Konstantin Tokarev escreveu: > But we could have Linux clang configuration with clazy plugin. Why? Clazy is not part of our development philosophy. We should only do that after there's a QUIP explaining which options in Clazy we use (which the

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

2017-05-04 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
04.05.2017, 16:53, "Thiago Macieira" : > Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:23:46 PDT, Heikki Halmet escreveu: >>  Clang 4: Do we really need this to be tested with Linux in CI? If yes, then >>  which configuration it will be replaced? > > I don't think we need to. The macOS builds should

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

2017-05-04 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em quinta-feira, 4 de maio de 2017, às 00:23:46 PDT, Heikki Halmet escreveu: > Clang 4: Do we really need this to be tested with Linux in CI? If yes, then > which configuration it will be replaced? I don't think we need to. The macOS builds should be sufficient for almost everything intrinsic to

Re: [Development] Proposal for Qt 5.10 platforms and configurations changes - SUMMARY

2017-05-04 Thread Heikki Halmet
Hi, First of all thank you for all these comments! There was few changes to the ‘proposal changes list’ and here is the summary: 32-bit iOS: will be dropped from CI and will be no longer supported by Qt OSX 10.10: will be dropped from CI, but will be supported by Qt GCC 7: When released it will