On 20 February 2013 08:47, Samuel Rødal samuel.ro...@digia.com wrote:
and it makes the diff between patch sets displayed by the Gerrit
interface (by choosing Old Version History to be other than Base)
totally unreadable.
The correct process when doing rebases is:
.. is it me or there's
On quarta-feira, 20 de fevereiro de 2013 08.47.40, Samuel Rødal wrote:
The correct process when doing rebases is:
git pull --rebase # or your favorite git work-flow
git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/some_branch
# add comment in change on gerrit about being a pure rebase
# do some changes
git
On 02/20/2013 09:22 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 20 de fevereiro de 2013 08.47.40, Samuel Rødal wrote:
The correct process when doing rebases is:
git pull --rebase # or your favorite git work-flow
git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/some_branch
# add comment in change on gerrit
On 02/20/2013 01:01 PM, Shawn Rutledge wrote:
On 20 February 2013 09:43, Samuel Rødal samuel.ro...@digia.com wrote:
On 02/20/2013 09:22 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On quarta-feira, 20 de fevereiro de 2013 08.47.40, Samuel Rødal wrote:
The correct process when doing rebases is:
git pull
Hello,
it happens quite regularly that people do a rebase and in addition do
changes in the same push. It looks like this:
git pull --rebase # or cherry-pick or whatever you do
# do some changes
git commit -a --amend
git push gerrit HEAD:refs/for/some_branch
and it makes the diff between patch