On Donnerstag, 21. April 2022 16:09:37 CEST Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On Thursday, 21 April 2022 06:22:57 PDT Tomi Pannila wrote:
> > Is there a possibility to add a picture to Qt documentation where you
> > have a rectangle grid and shade the
> > edge cells with some color to identify them as
On 21/04/2022 16:09, Thiago Macieira wrote:
It has some unintuitive defects and flaws, but they can't be fixed because
this class is OLD. We can improve documentation, but that's all. If drawing
the chess board as a stand-in for the pixel helps understand, then it might be
a good idea.
There
On Thursday, 21 April 2022 06:22:57 PDT Tomi Pannila wrote:
> Is there a possibility to add a picture to Qt documentation where you
> have a rectangle grid and shade the
> edge cells with some color to identify them as edges? If I'm the only
> one confused of the term edge, not edge cell, in
Hi Eirik,
I start to understand your point of view. You view edge from programming
point of view?
Like if you have a chess board, an edge cell is one where one cannot
take one cell step to all directions?
If I would have to point an edge of a chess board, I would point to the
physical edge.
On 4/20/22 17:50, Tomi Pannila wrote:
Hi Lars and Eirik,
thank you for the explanations. I guess Eirik kind of guessed right that
I view QRect from $\mathbb{R}^2$ point of view.
I'm a mathematician and this is the most natural point of view for me.
For me, rectangles have edges=boundary
Hi,
On 20/04/2022 17:50, Tomi Pannila wrote:
thank you for the explanations. I guess Eirik kind of guessed right that
I view QRect from $\mathbb{R}^2$ point of view.
I'm a mathematician and this is the most natural point of view for me.
For me, rectangles have edges=boundary which are measure
Hi Lars and Eirik,
thank you for the explanations. I guess Eirik kind of guessed right that
I view QRect from $\mathbb{R}^2$ point of view.
I'm a mathematician and this is the most natural point of view for me.
For me, rectangles have edges=boundary which are measure zero.
To Lars
>>
Hi Tomi,
I'm sure there are many things that could be improved in both doc and
code here, but let me try to explain how this was intended at least
could you please explain how your method "QRect::contains(const QRect
, bool proper)" at
Hi Tomi,
> On 19 Apr 2022, at 21:49, Tomi Pannila wrote:
>
> Hi Qt developers,
>
> could you please explain how your method "QRect::contains(const QRect ,
> bool proper)" at
> https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/corelib/tools/qrect.cpp?h=dev
> satisfies your API design principles
>
Hi Qt developers,
could you please explain how your method "QRect::contains(const QRect
, bool proper)" at
https://code.qt.io/cgit/qt/qtbase.git/tree/src/corelib/tools/qrect.cpp?h=dev
satisfies your API design principles
1. Have clear and simple semantics
2. Be intuitive
3. Be easy to
10 matches
Mail list logo
