Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em sex 21 fev 2014, às 07:25:46, Heikkinen Jani escreveu: > I was thinking that as well and discussed about this with my colleagues. The > only reason for this additional "official_releases" dir is that it will be > short list of releases instead of quite long list in Archive -folder. That > way it

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-20 Thread Heikkinen Jani
ent-bounces+jani.heikkinen=digia@qt-project.org > [mailto:development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=digia@qt-project.org] > On Behalf Of Thiago Macieira > Sent: 20. helmikuuta 2014 18:56 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing fr

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-20 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em qui 20 fev 2014, às 09:05:57, Heikkinen Jani escreveu: > - http://download.qt-project.org/official_releases/qt/ would have only > latest releases( currently 5.2.1 & 4.8.5) > > - http://download.qt-project.org/archive/qt/ would have all releases > (including latest ones) Why do we need the offi

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-20 Thread Knoll Lars
elopment-bounces+jani.heikkinen=digia@qt-project.org >> [mailto:development-bounces+jani.heikkinen=digia@qt-project.org] >> On Behalf Of Matthew Woehlke >> Sent: 19. helmikuuta 2014 18:14 >> To: development@qt-project.org >> Subject: Re: [Development] Q

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-20 Thread Heikkinen Jani
14 18:14 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the > archives > > On 2014-02-19 10:33, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > > What do you think of this arrangement?: > > - When a packages are released, put them straight in the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-19 Thread Matthew Woehlke
On 2014-02-19 10:33, Sze Howe Koh wrote: > What do you think of this arrangement?: > - When a packages are released, put them straight in the archive Yes, please. It drives people that need to reference source packages by URL (e.g. I bet this includes distro packagers) absolutely nuts to have th

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-19 Thread Sze Howe Koh
On 9 February 2014 00:13, Turunen Tuukka wrote: > > Idea is that old stuff is in the Archive, so that it is easier to found the > right thing for those looking recently released packages. Surely this could > be arranged in some other way as well. The current problem is, users who visit the offi

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-08 Thread Turunen Tuukka
Idea is that old stuff is in the Archive, so that it is easier to found the right thing for those looking recently released packages. Surely this could be arranged in some other way as well. Yours, -- Tuukka > "Thiago Macieira" kirjoitti 8.2.2014 kello 8.16: > >> Em sáb 08 fev 2014, às 11:3

Re: [Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-07 Thread Thiago Macieira
Em sáb 08 fev 2014, às 11:39:15, Sze Howe Koh escreveu: > As per the email subject, the archive is incomplete: > http://download.qt-project.org/archive/qt/ They're here: http://download.qt-project.org/official_releases/qt/ I don't know why we have two different places for the files. -- Thiago M

[Development] Qt 5.2.0 and Qt 5.1.1 are missing from the archives

2014-02-07 Thread Sze Howe Koh
As per the email subject, the archive is incomplete: http://download.qt-project.org/archive/qt/ Regards, Sze-Howe ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development