Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 11:35 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 01:18 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 12:59 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On sábado, 15 de julho de 2017 09:39:20 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: Yes of course, I should have anticipated that. So one option left would be to: - compile

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 01:18 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 12:59 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On sábado, 15 de julho de 2017 09:39:20 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: Yes of course, I should have anticipated that. So one option left would be to: - compile the Javascript file for each architecture /

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 07:49 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 07:21 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote: fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to see how root_ptr deals with objects which are reachable from multiple roots, which have independent lifetime Please provide an example.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 09:46 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 07:32 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 04:58 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 02:26 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 02:17 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote: fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 07:32 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 04:58 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 02:26 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 02:17 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote: fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to see how root_ptr deals with objects which are

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 07:21 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote: fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to see how root_ptr deals with objects which are reachable from multiple roots, which have independent lifetime Please provide an example. i've posted some already I'm working on the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 04:58 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 02:26 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 02:17 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote: fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to see how root_ptr deals with objects which are reachable from multiple roots, which have

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to see how root_ptr deals with objects which are reachable from multiple roots, which have independent lifetime >>> >>> Please provide an example. >> >> i've posted some already > > I'm working on the parser right

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 02:26 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/15/2017 02:17 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote: fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to see how root_ptr deals with objects which are reachable from multiple roots, which have independent lifetime Please provide an example.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 02:17 PM, Tim Blechmann wrote: fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to see how root_ptr deals with objects which are reachable from multiple roots, which have independent lifetime Please provide an example. i've posted some already I'm working on the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

>> fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to see how >> root_ptr deals with objects which are reachable from multiple roots, >> which have independent lifetime > > Please provide an example. i've posted some already ___

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

> Oh sorry they did invent Minesweeper and Basic, I give them that... https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Dartmouth_BASIC -- fwiw, to get this thread back to the main topic, i still fail to see how root_ptr deals with objects which are reachable from multiple roots, which have independent lifetime

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 12:59 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On sábado, 15 de julho de 2017 09:39:20 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: Yes of course, I should have anticipated that. So one option left would be to: - compile the Javascript file for each architecture / platform - link that "jex" to a portable dynamic

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On sábado, 15 de julho de 2017 09:39:20 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > Yes of course, I should have anticipated that. So one option left would > be to: > - compile the Javascript file for each architecture / platform > - link that "jex" to a portable dynamic library API > - run native containers

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/15/2017 02:56 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On sexta-feira, 14 de julho de 2017 12:13:52 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: [1] https://clearlinux.org/features/intel%C2%AE-clear-containers I understand but what's the problem with containers? I think Linux containers are also supported under

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On sexta-feira, 14 de julho de 2017 12:13:52 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > > [1] https://clearlinux.org/features/intel%C2%AE-clear-containers > > I understand but what's the problem with containers? I think Linux > containers are also supported under Windows. Obviously some efforts will > have to

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/14/2017 12:58 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/13/2017 10:32 AM, Grégoire Barbier wrote: Le 13/07/2017 à 14:33, Phil Bouchard a écrit : Sérgio Martins wrote: On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: Anyway I'm deviating from

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 14 de julho de 2017 10:08:13 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >>> Please read up a little on a subject before you make such an outlandish >>> suggestion. >> >> Yes sorry that was just a quick guess but in Linux you can run Linux >>

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On sexta-feira, 14 de julho de 2017 10:08:13 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > > Please read up a little on a subject before you make such an outlandish > > suggestion. > > Yes sorry that was just a quick guess but in Linux you can run Linux > containers which do the same but with minimal overhead. A

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Thiago Macieira wrote: > On sexta-feira, 14 de julho de 2017 05:06:14 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >>> Except for the fact that no browser would ever download and execute >>> untrusted binaries like that. >>> >>> The closest is Native Client (NaCl). >> >> You force that

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On sexta-feira, 14 de julho de 2017 05:06:14 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > > Except for the fact that no browser would ever download and execute > > untrusted binaries like that. > > > > The closest is Native Client (NaCl). > > You force that Javascript executable (".jex" file) to run inside some >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/14/2017 03:18 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 13 de julho de 2017 17:32:58 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: You just helped me figure something out: people want speed, right? - You offer a service which converts and compiles all Javascript files for most popular architectures (i386,

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

André Pönitz (13 July 2017 19:20) > There's no sensible reason to postpone "compilation" to run-time > on a million feeble devices if there's any sensible way to do it > ahead of time once on a beefy developer machine. On the other hand, doing run-time optimisation (which is one of the benefits a

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

14.07.2017, 10:18, "Thiago Macieira" : > On quinta-feira, 13 de julho de 2017 17:32:58 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >>  You just helped me figure something out: people want speed, right? >> >>  - You offer a service which converts and compiles all Javascript files >>  for

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On quinta-feira, 13 de julho de 2017 17:32:58 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > You just helped me figure something out: people want speed, right? > > - You offer a service which converts and compiles all Javascript files > for most popular architectures (i386, x86_64, ARM, MIPS, ...) > - You cache

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/13/2017 10:32 AM, Grégoire Barbier wrote: Le 13/07/2017 à 14:33, Phil Bouchard a écrit : Sérgio Martins wrote: On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: Anyway I'm deviating from QNodePtr but I just don't understand the hype about

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/13/2017 10:32 AM, Grégoire Barbier wrote: Le 13/07/2017 à 14:33, Phil Bouchard a écrit : I'm working on it; it shouldn't take too long. <3 « I have discovered a truly marvelous proof of this, which this margin is too narrow to contain. » Pierre de Fermat, 1637 A.D. Took 356 years to

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/13/2017 01:20 PM, André Pönitz wrote: On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:54:54PM -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/12/2017 10:28 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 12:34:35 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: I don't know about you but a minimalist version of g++ embedded

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

André Pönitz wrote: > On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:54:54PM -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/12/2017 10:28 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >On quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 12:34:35 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > >>I don't know about you but a minimalist version of g++ embedded

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On Wed, Jul 12, 2017 at 11:54:54PM -0400, Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/12/2017 10:28 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > >On quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 12:34:35 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > >>I don't know about you but a minimalist version of g++ embedded inside the > >>browser could be beneficial

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Grégoire Barbier wrote: > Le 13/07/2017 à 14:33, Phil Bouchard a écrit : > Sérgio Martins wrote: >> On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: >>> Anyway I'm deviating from QNodePtr but I just don't understand the hype >>>

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Le 13/07/2017 à 14:33, Phil Bouchard a écrit : Sérgio Martins wrote: On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: Anyway I'm deviating from QNodePtr but I just don't understand the hype about JIT when it doesn't seem it has been compared to

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Sérgio Martins wrote: > On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: >> Anyway I'm deviating from QNodePtr but I just don't understand the hype >> about JIT when it doesn't seem it has been compared to a Javascript compiler >> because none

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On Thu, Jul 13, 2017 at 4:54 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > Anyway I'm deviating from QNodePtr but I just don't understand the hype > about JIT when it doesn't seem it has been compared to a Javascript compiler > because none exists up to now. That's precisely the biggest

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/13/2017 04:09 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 13.07.2017, 02:39, "Phil Bouchard" : On 07/12/2017 07:25 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/12/2017 04:56 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: Now add time of compilation to the sum So I just did benchmark the following C++

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

13.07.2017, 02:39, "Phil Bouchard" : > On 07/12/2017 07:25 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: >>  On 07/12/2017 04:56 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>>  Now add time of compilation to the sum >> >>  So I just did benchmark the following C++ file featuring a loop within >>  the code

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/13/2017 12:13 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: Third, only 1.8 times faster? That's actually a very impressive JIT. I'd have expected a much worse number. Yes but the longer the loop lasts in the example, the greater the difference is between the executable and Node.JS. The "speed slope" is

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 20:54:54 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/12/2017 10:28 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 12 de julho de 2017 12:34:35 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > >> I don't know about you but a minimalist version of g++ embedded inside > >> the > >> browser could

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/12/2017 07:25 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/12/2017 04:56 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: Now add time of compilation to the sum So I just did benchmark the following C++ file featuring a loop within the code (the loop was at the bash shell level previously):

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/12/2017 10:58 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/11/2017 04:02 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote: On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to simulate functions that return a function. how to you cope with structures like:

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/12/2017 04:56 PM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 12.07.2017, 22:35, "Phil Bouchard" : Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/11/2017 06:36 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 10.07.2017, 21:56, "Phil Bouchard" : Phil Bouchard

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

12.07.2017, 22:35, "Phil Bouchard" : > Phil Bouchard wrote: >>  On 07/11/2017 06:36 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >>>  10.07.2017, 21:56, "Phil Bouchard" :  Phil Bouchard wrote: >  BTW converting

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/11/2017 06:36 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: >> >> >> 10.07.2017, 21:56, "Phil Bouchard" : >>> Phil Bouchard wrote: BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do >>> >>> In fact, is

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/11/2017 04:02 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote: >>> On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to >>> simulate functions that return a function. >> >> how to you cope with structures like: >> >> function foo( outObject ) >> { >>

Re: [Development] QT 5.9. Issues with QWebEngine

stem settings or - through QNetworkProxy::applicationProxy Regards Kai > -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Sudhir Sharma > Sent: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2017 12:18 > To: development@qt-project.or

Re: [Development] QT 5.9. Issues with QWebEngine

; -Original Message- > From: Development [mailto:development-bounces+kai.koehne=qt.io@qt- > project.org] On Behalf Of Sudhir Sharma > Sent: Mittwoch, 12. Juli 2017 12:18 > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: [Development] QT 5.9. Issues with QWebEngine > > HI, >

[Development] QT 5.9. Issues with QWebEngine

HI, QWebEngine does not take exact proxy settings from System (as done in internet browsers like Chrome) Internet client is configured to use proxy for internet addresses and bypass it for local addresses. But it does not happen. QWebEngine fails to bypass proxy for local urls. Scenarios: -

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Le 11/07/2017 à 13:49, Phil Bouchard a écrit : On 07/11/2017 04:02 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote: On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to simulate functions that return a function. how to you cope with structures like: function foo( outObject ) { var object = {}

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/11/2017 06:36 AM, Konstantin Tokarev wrote: 10.07.2017, 21:56, "Phil Bouchard" : Phil Bouchard wrote: BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do In fact, is it me or it would seem that: - converting the Javascript code into

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/11/2017 04:02 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote: On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to simulate functions that return a function. how to you cope with structures like: function foo( outObject ) { var object = {} outObject.object = object outObject.result

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Phil > Bouchard > <philipp...@gmail.com> > Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:49:05 PM > To: development@qt-project.org > Subject: Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + > root_ptr > > On 07/11/2017 04:02

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

e attempt of calling it. Simon From: Development <development-bounces+simon.hausmann=qt...@qt-project.org> on behalf of Phil Bouchard <philipp...@gmail.com> Sent: Tuesday, July 11, 2017 1:49:05 PM To: development@qt-project.org Subject: Re: [Development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/11/2017 04:02 AM, Tim Blechmann wrote: On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to simulate functions that return a function. how to you cope with structures like: function foo( outObject ) { var object = {} outObject.object = object outObject.result

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

10.07.2017, 21:56, "Phil Bouchard" : > Phil Bouchard wrote: >>  BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do > > In fact, is it me or it would seem that: > - converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly > - compiling the resulting

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

11.07.2017, 07:52, "Phil Bouchard" : > On 07/10/2017 05:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: >>  On segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017 11:56:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >>>  Phil Bouchard wrote:  BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

> On the other hand, I have good news as I think I have found a way to > simulate functions that return a function. how to you cope with structures like: function foo( outObject ) { var object = {} outObject.object = object outObject.result = function() { return object } return

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/10/2017 05:08 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017 11:56:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: Phil Bouchard wrote: BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do In fact, is it me or it would seem that: - converting the Javascript

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On segunda-feira, 10 de julho de 2017 11:56:07 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > Phil Bouchard wrote: > > BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do > > In fact, is it me or it would seem that: > - converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly > - compiling the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On Wed, Jul 5, 2017 at 5:03 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: > Hi, > > I read Qt 5.9 is using a new garbage collector that is more predictable. > First good job and second I was wondering if there is any documentation on > that garbage collector in question. The documentation is

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Phil Bouchard wrote: > > BTW converting Javascript into C++ seems very easy to do In fact, is it me or it would seem that: - converting the Javascript code into C++ on-the-fly - compiling the resulting C++ code Would be a more efficient alternative than all these JIT

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Thiago Macieira wrote: > On domingo, 9 de julho de 2017 21:13:33 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >> On 07/09/2017 10:22 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: >>> On 07/09/2017 06:35 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: I'm sure there is an equivalent in Qt but I'll need some pointers to

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On domingo, 9 de julho de 2017 15:35:43 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > > You'll also need to disentangle it from Boost before it can be used in Qt. > > Move it to independent headers depending only on the C++98 standard > > library ( C++11 core language features are ok). > > The licenses are

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On sábado, 8 de julho de 2017 15:57:50 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > https://github.com/philippeb8/root_ptr/blob/develop/example/javascript_examp > le1.cpp > > The application outputs: > Scope 0: BEGIN > Scope 1: BEGIN > A::A(const boost::node_proxy&) > A::A(const boost::node_proxy&) > A::~A() >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/08/2017 12:42 AM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/07/2017 10:14 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: But if I can do a deep copy then I can certainly "re-set" the variable (change the set the variable is owned by). If I can do that then we won't need any deep copy. I just need to think a little bit...

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

> - the parameters of the function will remain unaffected if they are used as > r-values > - the parameters of the function will require a deep copy of the expression > if they are used as l-values https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Evaluation_strategy#Call_by_sharing function foo( arg ) { var

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On sexta-feira, 7 de julho de 2017 06:30:22 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > > how do you solve the situation that an object might be referenced by > > multiple roots? > > Please elaborate because as far as I know variables in Javascript have a > function scope and functions can be nested (waterfall

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Tim Blechmann wrote: >> If there is one root_ptr per >> Javascript function then all local variables are guaranteed to be >> destroyed. And closures aren't too big of a deal either because child >> objects can easily refer to their parent. >> >> But returning local variables

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/07/2017 04:39 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote: >> Phil Bouchard (7 July 2017 04:15) >>> >>> Anything that goes in that HTML page or QML window we don't care. The >>> reference counted property of root_ptr (node_ptr) will handle it and >>> the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

> If there is one root_ptr per > Javascript function then all local variables are guaranteed to be > destroyed. And closures aren't too big of a deal either because child > objects can easily refer to their parent. > > But returning local variables might need some work on root_ptr such as >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/07/2017 04:39 AM, Edward Welbourne wrote: Phil Bouchard (7 July 2017 04:15) Anything that goes in that HTML page or QML window we don't care. The reference counted property of root_ptr (node_ptr) will handle it and the associated root_ptr will clean up the mess when it is destroyed.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On Thu, 6 Jul 2017, Thiago Macieira wrote: By the way, how does it break the cycle? Like I was saying before, node_ptr enlists each pointee object to the associated root_ptr and when the root_ptr is destroyed then everything gets wiped out. See above. Your answer is "it doesn't break the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On quinta-feira, 6 de julho de 2017 04:53:16 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: >>> It's all memory usage and bad programming habits vs execution speed. >>> Why would you want to add objects that are never used? A minimum >>> programming skills set is required here. You're saying the actual >>> garbage

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On quinta-feira, 6 de julho de 2017 20:48:27 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > > How well does root_ptr operate when there are cyclic references? > > JavaScript > > objects can refer to each other, so how do you propose the engine handle > > that case? > > It's very easy. Every time a node_ptr is

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/06/2017 10:57 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 6 de julho de 2017 19:15:02 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: As you know in Javascript temporary unnamed variables from a primitive type are no different than local variables and even if global variables are not encouraged then they will

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On quinta-feira, 6 de julho de 2017 19:15:02 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > > The point is that the *language* requires us to have a garbage collector > > to > > operate like that. So explain to me how root_ptr will work in that > > context. > > As you know in Javascript temporary unnamed variables

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/06/2017 11:10 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quinta-feira, 6 de julho de 2017 04:53:16 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: It's all memory usage and bad programming habits vs execution speed. Why would you want to add objects that are never used? A minimum programming skills set is required here.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On quinta-feira, 6 de julho de 2017 04:53:16 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > On 07/06/2017 01:01 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: > > On quarta-feira, 5 de julho de 2017 19:32:35 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > >> - Well with root_ptr the behavior is 100% predictable thus you won't > >> have these rendering lags

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/06/2017 01:01 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On quarta-feira, 5 de julho de 2017 19:32:35 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: - Well with root_ptr the behavior is 100% predictable thus you won't have these rendering lags at random times. So explain to me how the QML engine should collect JS items that

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On quarta-feira, 5 de julho de 2017 19:32:35 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > - Well with root_ptr the behavior is 100% predictable thus you won't > have these rendering lags at random times. So explain to me how the QML engine should collect JS items that have gone unused and unreferenced during the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On quarta-feira, 5 de julho de 2017 15:31:28 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > For example in HTML we could have 1 root_ptr for each HTML page and when > this page is destroyed then the root_ptr guarantees all associated nodes > will be destructed as well. When I refer to a node I mean the >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/05/2017 06:31 PM, Phil Bouchard wrote: On 07/05/2017 02:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 21:03:14 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: Hi, I read Qt 5.9 is using a new garbage collector that is more predictable. First good job and second I was wondering if there is any

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On 07/05/2017 02:29 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote: On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 21:03:14 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: Hi, I read Qt 5.9 is using a new garbage collector that is more predictable. First good job and second I was wondering if there is any documentation on that garbage collector in question.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9's new garbage collector documentation? + root_ptr

On Tuesday, 4 July 2017 21:03:14 PDT Phil Bouchard wrote: > Hi, > > I read Qt 5.9 is using a new garbage collector that is more predictable. > First good job and second I was wondering if there is any > documentation on that garbage collector in question. That might be in the QML engine VM.

[Development] Qt 5.9 RC2 released

Hi all, Qt 5.9 RC2 is available. It is Qt 5.9 RC + https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/c/195341/ At this time RC2 is available via online installers only, instructions here: https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer. And because there is only one change after official RC we

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 beta4 available

There is also another regression QTBUG-59704 which is still unsolved. -- Oleg Yadrov oleg.yad...@qt.io > On May 16, 2017, at 1:14 PM, Robin Burchell wrote: > > Thanks for the report. I'll take a look at finishing this tonight. > > -- > Robin Burchell >

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 beta4 available

Thanks for the report. I'll take a look at finishing this tonight. -- Robin Burchell ro...@crimson.no On Tue, May 16, 2017, at 06:43 PM, Тимур Артиков wrote: > Hi, > I believe, QTBUG-60547 should be fixed before the release. > ___ > Development

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 beta4 available

Hi, I believe, QTBUG-60547 should be fixed before the release. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman/listinfo/development

[Development] Qt 5.9 beta4 available

Hi all, Qt 5.9 beta4 is now available. Instructions how to get the release are here: https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer. Diff to beta3 can be found as an attachment. Please test the release and report your effort via https://wiki.qt.io/Qt59_release_testing. Beta4

[Development] Qt 5.9 beta3 available

Hi all, Qt 5.9 beta3 is now available. Instructions how to get the release are here: https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer. Diff to second beta can be found as an attachment. Please test the release and report your effort via https://wiki.qt.io/Qt59_release_testing. I

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 beta2 available

> On Apr 24, 2017, at 13:45, Martin Koller wrote: > > On Freitag, 21. April 2017 09:08:00 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> Qt 5.9 beta2 is now available. Instructions how to get the release are here: >> https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer.

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 beta2 available

On Freitag, 21. April 2017 09:08:00 CEST Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Hi all, > > Qt 5.9 beta2 is now available. Instructions how to get the release are here: > https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer. Diff to first > beta can be found as an attachment. > > Please test the

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 Header diff (API review)

Lars Knoll (21 April 2017 10:10) > Let us know once the updated diffs are available. No point doing the review > on the old diffs. Done :-) Eddy. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 Header diff (API review)

> On 21 Apr 2017, at 10:08, Edward Welbourne wrote: > > Lars Knoll (20 April 2017 12:19) >> Some of the diffs don’t look like they are 100% up to date. Eddy? > > Indeed, I've just been updating them on request. > I do plan on a bulk update today. Thanks! Let us know

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 Header diff (API review)

Lars Knoll (20 April 2017 12:19) > Some of the diffs don’t look like they are 100% up to date. Eddy? Indeed, I've just been updating them on request. I do plan on a bulk update today. Eddy. ___ Development mailing list

[Development] Qt 5.9 beta2 available

Hi all, Qt 5.9 beta2 is now available. Instructions how to get the release are here: https://wiki.qt.io/How_to_get_snapshot_via_online_installer. Diff to first beta can be found as an attachment. Please test the release and report your effort via https://wiki.qt.io/Qt59_release_testing. I

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 Header diff (API review)

Some of the diffs don’t look like they are 100% up to date. Eddy? Lars > On 20 Apr 2017, at 11:43, Jani Heikkinen wrote: > > Hi all, > > It is time to do official Header diff for Qt 5.9 APIs (compared to Qt 5.8.0) > > From here you can find the diffs: >

[Development] Qt 5.9 Header diff (API review)

Hi all, It is time to do official Header diff for Qt 5.9 APIs (compared to Qt 5.8.0) >From here you can find the diffs: >https://codereview.qt-project.org/#/q/branch:5.9+topic:%22API+Review%22,n,z >(thanks to Eddy!) Please do the review now if not done yet. We should get '+2' for each

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 alpha & mapbox-gl-native on windows ?

> But what desktop platform (if any) is most stable right now for mapboxgl? We tested it on OSX, Linux (Ubuntu, but CI bot is passing on RHL and Yocto too), iOS and Android. ___ Development mailing list Development@qt-project.org

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 API review

Jani Heikkinen (28 February 2017 11:09): > It seems Qt 5.9 API review is still badly ongoing, see [snip] FTR, we have some on-going fixes in progress in qtbase. > Please finalize the reviews & do needed fixes as soon as possible so that we > will be ready for beta early enough. If your module

Re: [Development] Qt 5.9 API review

On Tuesday 28 February 2017 10:09:13 Jani Heikkinen wrote: > Hi all, > > It seems Qt 5.9 API review is still badly ongoing, see > https://codereview.qt-project.org/184392qt3d We went through this last week and resulted in: https://bugreports.qt.io/secure/RapidBoard.jspa?rapidView=48

  1   2   >