On Thursday, 8 de December de 2011 12.02.42, João Abecasis wrote:
It should be fairly simple to add an inline templated connect function that
takes a pointer-like type, unwraps the actual pointer and calls the real
connect. (e.g., using something like boost::get_pointer and hooking our
pointer
On Monday 05 December 2011 14:50:23 Jeff Mitchell wrote:
QSharedPointer:
* Use for all three (disk cache, cookie jar, qnam) so that the user can
keep a ref around if they want (also for the static methods)
* Make QSharedPointer be able to delete properly with a forward declaration
Not
On 12/06/2011 12:32 AM, ext Thiago Macieira wrote:
(...)
The cache, however, could be an issue. Imagine I do a get() from an auxiliary
thread, one that the QNAM and the cache are not affined to. The implementation
would need to read from the cache in one thread and make the data available to
On Dec 6, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 de December de 2011 12.24.11, Peter Hartmann wrote:
Another interesting thing to note is that AFAIU with WebKit 2 there can
be multiple web processes per application, all using the same cache (and
cookie jar), so we would
On Dec 5, 2011, at 4:50 PM, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
Hello,
Hi,
I was asked to put this information on the wiki, but wasn't actually
sure where the correct place was to do it. I'll put the info here and it
can be moved into the wiki later.
At the Contributor Day in San Francisco, a number
On Tue, Dec 6, 2011 at 1:43 PM, Alexis Menard
alexis.men...@openbossa.orgwrote:
On Dec 6, 2011, at 12:40 PM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 de December de 2011 12.24.11, Peter Hartmann wrote:
Another interesting thing to note is that AFAIU with WebKit 2 there can
be multiple web
On Tuesday, 6 de December de 2011 13.56.18, Jonas Gastal wrote:
Sorry if this is a stupid point, but there is a pretty standard mechanism
for
multiprocess mutexes in the form of .lock files. Isn't this an obvious
and
acceptable solution(to that part of the issue)? They have the same up/down
On 12/06/2011 11:09 AM, Thiago Macieira wrote:
On Tuesday, 6 de December de 2011 13.56.18, Jonas Gastal wrote:
Sorry if this is a stupid point, but there is a pretty standard mechanism
for
multiprocess mutexes in the form of .lock files. Isn't this an obvious
and
acceptable solution(to that
On Monday, 5 de December de 2011 14.50.23, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
At the Contributor Day in San Francisco, a number of people met to
discuss some of the issues involving QtNetwork, espcially
QNetworkAccessManager (QNAM). The overall idea is that eventually
QNetworkAccessManager, which is meant
On Monday, 5 de December de 2011 14.50.23, Jeff Mitchell wrote:
At the Contributor Day in San Francisco, a number of people met to
discuss some of the issues involving QtNetwork, espcially
QNetworkAccessManager (QNAM). The overall idea is that eventually
QNetworkAccessManager, which is
10 matches
Mail list logo
