Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-12 Thread Kevin Kofler
Marco Martin wrote: > yeah, I also see it more like as a temporary solution as well, if not else > for the fact that it can work only on QApplication instances. > For us it's important to get in a short enough time span a good compelling > reasons for applications to start using qtquickcontrols2,

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-11 Thread Eike Hein
On 11/11/2016 05:02 PM, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > If QStyle is used by QWidgets, which have been used in apps since well > before QML existed, it's reasonable to expect that its performance is > more than acceptable for modern desktop machines. Not necessarily. This isn't about native QStyle

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-11 Thread Alberto Mardegan
On 10/11/2016 11:55, Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > The last gap are Linux styles. The situation with KDE is actually quite > interesting, since the platform is QStyle based. We do not believe in QStyle > based styles for QQC2 as it stands. They will never have the same performance > level of the

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-10 Thread Konstantin Tokarev
10.11.2016, 17:08, "Marco Martin" : > On Thursday 10 November 2016 11:11:35 Olivier Goffart wrote: >>  Writing and polishing styles to pixel perfection is indeed lot of work. And >>  QStyle has the advantage hat it already exists. However one can copy-paste >>  the code to

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-10 Thread Jake Petroules
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 6:08 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Thursday 10 November 2016 11:11:35 Olivier Goffart wrote: >> Writing and polishing styles to pixel perfection is indeed lot of work. And >> QStyle has the advantage hat it already exists. However one can copy-paste >>

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-10 Thread Marco Martin
On Thursday 10 November 2016 11:11:35 Olivier Goffart wrote: > Writing and polishing styles to pixel perfection is indeed lot of work. And > QStyle has the advantage hat it already exists. However one can copy-paste > the code to turn existing styles into QCC2 style. (You will have two style > to

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-10 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Donnerstag, 10. November 2016 09:55:00 CET Frederik Gladhorn wrote: > Hello all, > let's take a step back and get back into a productive discussion :) > > I'm sorry that Jake uses so harsh words and I hope everyone understands he > expresses his personal opinion since he's not even directly

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-10 Thread Frederik Gladhorn
Hello all, let's take a step back and get back into a productive discussion :) I'm sorry that Jake uses so harsh words and I hope everyone understands he expresses his personal opinion since he's not even directly involved in the Qt Quick Controls (1/2) project. Yesterday we had some debate

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-09 Thread Jake Petroules
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Aleix Pol wrote: >>> we plan to keep it >>> multiplatform and with no external dependency other than Qt modules (that's >>> what KDE framework tier 1 means). A big reason is actually that it would be >>> quite easier to contribute to it. >> >> And

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-09 Thread Aleix Pol
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Jake Petroules wrote: > >> On Nov 9, 2016, at 7:30 AM, Marco Martin wrote: >> >> On Tuesday 08 November 2016 18:47:06 Jake Petroules wrote: I was planning to keep it a KDE project, probably as a tier 1 framework. >>>

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-09 Thread Jake Petroules
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 7:30 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 November 2016 18:47:06 Jake Petroules wrote: >>> I was planning to keep it a KDE project, probably as a tier 1 framework. >> >> That seems like a bad idea. Let's submit it to Qt so that everyone can >>

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-09 Thread Marco Martin
On Tuesday 08 November 2016 18:47:06 Jake Petroules wrote: > > I was planning to keep it a KDE project, probably as a tier 1 framework. > > That seems like a bad idea. Let's submit it to Qt so that everyone can > benefit and it can be kept better maintained alongside Qt and for all > platforms.

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-08 Thread Jake Petroules
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Marco Martin wrote: > > On Tuesday 08 November 2016, Alberto Mardegan wrote: >>> Even if is still incomplete (and are things that unfortunately can't be >>> fully styled yet in a fully desktop friendly way) it seems to work >>> remarkably well.

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-08 Thread Marco Martin
On Tuesday 08 November 2016, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > > Even if is still incomplete (and are things that unfortunately can't be > > fully styled yet in a fully desktop friendly way) it seems to work > > remarkably well. > > That looks smart and simple! Any plans for submitting that to Qt, maybe

Re: [Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-07 Thread Marco Martin
On Sunday 06 November 2016, Alberto Mardegan wrote: > Hi there! > I'm working on a project of a desktop application using the > QtQuickControls module. I occasionally run into small issue, but I'm > generally satisfied with the state of the controls (I'm working on > Linux, I hope that other

[Development] QtQuickControls for desktop: what's the plan?

2016-11-06 Thread Alberto Mardegan
Hi there! I'm working on a project of a desktop application using the QtQuickControls module. I occasionally run into small issue, but I'm generally satisfied with the state of the controls (I'm working on Linux, I hope that other platforms are working equally well). What makes me worry a bit