Marco Martin wrote:
> yeah, I also see it more like as a temporary solution as well, if not else
> for the fact that it can work only on QApplication instances.
> For us it's important to get in a short enough time span a good compelling
> reasons for applications to start using qtquickcontrols2,
On 11/11/2016 05:02 PM, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> If QStyle is used by QWidgets, which have been used in apps since well
> before QML existed, it's reasonable to expect that its performance is
> more than acceptable for modern desktop machines.
Not necessarily. This isn't about native QStyle
On 10/11/2016 11:55, Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> The last gap are Linux styles. The situation with KDE is actually quite
> interesting, since the platform is QStyle based. We do not believe in QStyle
> based styles for QQC2 as it stands. They will never have the same performance
> level of the
10.11.2016, 17:08, "Marco Martin" :
> On Thursday 10 November 2016 11:11:35 Olivier Goffart wrote:
>> Writing and polishing styles to pixel perfection is indeed lot of work. And
>> QStyle has the advantage hat it already exists. However one can copy-paste
>> the code to
> On Nov 10, 2016, at 6:08 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
>
> On Thursday 10 November 2016 11:11:35 Olivier Goffart wrote:
>> Writing and polishing styles to pixel perfection is indeed lot of work. And
>> QStyle has the advantage hat it already exists. However one can copy-paste
>>
On Thursday 10 November 2016 11:11:35 Olivier Goffart wrote:
> Writing and polishing styles to pixel perfection is indeed lot of work. And
> QStyle has the advantage hat it already exists. However one can copy-paste
> the code to turn existing styles into QCC2 style. (You will have two style
> to
On Donnerstag, 10. November 2016 09:55:00 CET Frederik Gladhorn wrote:
> Hello all,
> let's take a step back and get back into a productive discussion :)
>
> I'm sorry that Jake uses so harsh words and I hope everyone understands he
> expresses his personal opinion since he's not even directly
Hello all,
let's take a step back and get back into a productive discussion :)
I'm sorry that Jake uses so harsh words and I hope everyone understands he
expresses his personal opinion since he's not even directly involved in the Qt
Quick Controls (1/2) project.
Yesterday we had some debate
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 3:40 PM, Aleix Pol wrote:
>>> we plan to keep it
>>> multiplatform and with no external dependency other than Qt modules (that's
>>> what KDE framework tier 1 means). A big reason is actually that it would be
>>> quite easier to contribute to it.
>>
>> And
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 6:49 PM, Jake Petroules wrote:
>
>> On Nov 9, 2016, at 7:30 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
>>
>> On Tuesday 08 November 2016 18:47:06 Jake Petroules wrote:
I was planning to keep it a KDE project, probably as a tier 1 framework.
>>>
> On Nov 9, 2016, at 7:30 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 08 November 2016 18:47:06 Jake Petroules wrote:
>>> I was planning to keep it a KDE project, probably as a tier 1 framework.
>>
>> That seems like a bad idea. Let's submit it to Qt so that everyone can
>>
On Tuesday 08 November 2016 18:47:06 Jake Petroules wrote:
> > I was planning to keep it a KDE project, probably as a tier 1 framework.
>
> That seems like a bad idea. Let's submit it to Qt so that everyone can
> benefit and it can be kept better maintained alongside Qt and for all
> platforms.
> On Nov 8, 2016, at 1:45 AM, Marco Martin wrote:
>
> On Tuesday 08 November 2016, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
>>> Even if is still incomplete (and are things that unfortunately can't be
>>> fully styled yet in a fully desktop friendly way) it seems to work
>>> remarkably well.
On Tuesday 08 November 2016, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> > Even if is still incomplete (and are things that unfortunately can't be
> > fully styled yet in a fully desktop friendly way) it seems to work
> > remarkably well.
>
> That looks smart and simple! Any plans for submitting that to Qt, maybe
On Sunday 06 November 2016, Alberto Mardegan wrote:
> Hi there!
> I'm working on a project of a desktop application using the
> QtQuickControls module. I occasionally run into small issue, but I'm
> generally satisfied with the state of the controls (I'm working on
> Linux, I hope that other
Hi there!
I'm working on a project of a desktop application using the
QtQuickControls module. I occasionally run into small issue, but I'm
generally satisfied with the state of the controls (I'm working on
Linux, I hope that other platforms are working equally well).
What makes me worry a bit
16 matches
Mail list logo