07.10.2013 23:27, Thiago Macieira пишет:
On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2013 22:50:49, Dmitry Ashkadov wrote:
The topic about exceptions for slots and signals has inspirited me to
pay your attention to QtTest. QtTest is a good unit-test framework, but
it is focused to Qt. I think QtTest
Op 7-10-2013 21:27, Thiago Macieira schreef:
On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2013 22:50:49, Dmitry Ashkadov wrote:
The topic about exceptions for slots and signals has inspirited me to
pay your attention to QtTest. QtTest is a good unit-test framework, but
it is focused to Qt. I think QtTest
On terça-feira, 8 de outubro de 2013 11:50:25, Dmitry Ashkadov wrote:
QtTest doesn't provide macro like QVERIFY_EXCEPTION(expression,
expected_exception). And any other compare/verify macro should handle
exceptions. This will reduce code in test slot.
Sounds like a nice new feature addition
On terça-feira, 8 de outubro de 2013 09:56:59, André Somers wrote:
QtTest can test code with exceptions.
Just make sure that your exceptions don't escape the test slots. That's a
reasonable requirement.
Would it be reasonable/possible to record a FAIL on an exception instead?
Yes. And
Hello!
The topic about exceptions for slots and signals has inspirited me to
pay your attention to QtTest. QtTest is a good unit-test framework, but
it is focused to Qt. I think QtTest may be used for any project,
moreover it may be used as unit testing framework for project that
doesn't use
On segunda-feira, 7 de outubro de 2013 22:50:49, Dmitry Ashkadov wrote:
The topic about exceptions for slots and signals has inspirited me to
pay your attention to QtTest. QtTest is a good unit-test framework, but
it is focused to Qt. I think QtTest may be used for any project,
moreover it
