On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 12:22:16PM -0500, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote:
> So right now we've got:
>
> qtwinextras: qt/dev
> qtmacextras: playground/master
> qtx11extras: qt/master
>
> I take it qtx11extras is pretty much "finished", so that makes sense. And
> seeing from the past discussion, qtwi
So right now we've got:
qtwinextras: qt/dev
qtmacextras: playground/master
qtx11extras: qt/master
I take it qtx11extras is pretty much "finished", so that makes sense. And
seeing from the past discussion, qtwinextras being in qt on dev makes sense.
But now qtmacextras is sticking out like a sor
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:58 AM, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> There is also a well documented and "robust" solution for that, too.
>
I meant "workaround" for sure. :-)
___
Development mailing list
Development@qt-project.org
http://lists.qt-project.org/mailman
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:38 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:00:35AM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> > On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <
> oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote:
> >
> > > - as we know, gerrit is too limited
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 11:00:35AM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen
> wrote:
>
> > - as we know, gerrit is too limited to actually allow it
>
> Actually, this will be pretty simple after the gerrit update.
>
i'll call it "pretty simple" when ther
On Fri, Feb 15, 2013 at 10:13 AM, Oswald Buddenhagen <
oswald.buddenha...@digia.com> wrote:
> - as we know, gerrit is too limited to actually allow it
Actually, this will be pretty simple after the gerrit update.
Laszlo
___
Development mailing list
De
> -Original Message-
> From: development-bounces+simo.falt=digia@qt-project.org
> [mailto:development-bounces+simo.falt=digia@qt-project.org] On
> Behalf Of Oswald Buddenhagen
> Sent: 15. helmikuuta 2013 12:14
> To: development@qt-project.org
> Subj
On 2/15/13 11:13 AM, "Oswald Buddenhagen"
wrote:
>On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:01:31PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Knoll Lars
>>wrote:
>> > Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
>> >
>> > I've now created the repository.
>> > ssh
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 11:01:31PM +, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> > Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
> >
> > I've now created the repository.
> > ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtwinextras.git.
> >
eh
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 9:16 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
>
> I've now created the repository.
> ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtwinextras.git.
>
Lars, just double checking for making sure: you meant to create
qt/qtwine
Thank you, Lars!
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
On Feb 14, 2013, at 4:16 PM, Knoll Lars wrote:
> Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
>
> I've now created the repository
Well, I already gave that my approval some days ago in another thread.
I've now created the repository.
ssh://codereview.qt-project.org:29418/qt/qtwinextras.git.
Cheers,
Lars
On 2/14/13 9:23 PM, "Jake Thomas Petroules"
wrote:
>Ah, I see.
>I've only recently started contributing to the Qt Proje
Ah, I see.
I've only recently started contributing to the Qt Project so I'm not familiar
with everything yet. Sorry about that!
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
On Feb 14, 2013, at 3:20 PM, Laszlo Papp wro
On Thu, Feb 14, 2013 at 7:59 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules <
jake.petrou...@petroules.com> wrote:
> I was under the impression we were already waiting for step 4 since there
> have been a decent number of messages on the mailing list regarding this
> proposal, and everyone seems to know what the modul
I was under the impression we were already waiting for step 4 since there have
been a decent number of messages on the mailing list regarding this proposal,
and everyone seems to know what the module is for and why we need it. Anyways,
is this what you want?
Request for new playground module fo
Please read the rules (and follow in the future):
http://qt-project.org/wiki/Creating-a-new-module-or-tool-for-Qt
Seems, no maintainer gave a +1 yet. You need to get one first. :-)
On Fri, Jan 18, 2013 at 5:47 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules <
jake.petrou...@petroules.com> wrote:
> As many OS/WM utili
As we have a QtMacExtras and QtX11Extras, could someone please create a
QtWindowsExtras as well?
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
___
Development mailing list
Deve
On 01/19/2013 03:47 AM, Jake Thomas Petroules wrote:
As many OS/WM utility methods were removed from Qt 5, we need to
reimplement their functionality in the QtWindowsExtras, QtMacExtras,
and QtX11Extras libraries.
For example, in QtMacExtras we have a unified toolbar implementation
that repla
As many OS/WM utility methods were removed from Qt 5, we need to reimplement
their functionality in the QtWindowsExtras, QtMacExtras, and QtX11Extras
libraries.
For example, in QtMacExtras we have a unified toolbar implementation that
replaces setUnifiedTitleAndToolbar(), and converter function
On Thu, Jan 17, 2013 at 8:58 PM, Jake Thomas Petroules <
jake.petrou...@petroules.com> wrote:
> As we have a QtMacExtras and QtX11Extras, could someone please create a
> QtWindowsExtras as well?
>
Could you please elaborate about the use case?
Laszlo
_
As we have a QtMacExtras and QtX11Extras, could someone please create a
QtWindowsExtras as well?
Jake Petroules
Petroules Corporation (www.petroules.com)
Email: jake.petrou...@petroules.com
Telephone: +1 (970) 587-3821
___
Development mailing list
Devel
21 matches
Mail list logo
