On Wednesday 16 May 2012 23:49:42 John Layt wrote:
> Actually removing the "abstract" base class is just a case of
> s/QAbstractPrintDialog/QPrintDialog and tweaking the constructors, as the
> class is not really abstract, the only virtual method is exec(), nothing
> else gets reimplemented in the
On Wednesday 16 May 2012 10:14:27 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 00.07.10, John Layt wrote:
> > The QAbstractPritnDialog and QAbstractPageSetupDialog classes are
> > completely unnecessary, are given as bad examples in the Qt API design
> > standards, and were marked
On quarta-feira, 16 de maio de 2012 00.07.10, John Layt wrote:
> The QAbstractPritnDialog and QAbstractPageSetupDialog classes are
> completely unnecessary, are given as bad examples in the Qt API design
> standards, and were marked to be merged with QPrintDialog and
> QPageSetupDialog in Qt5.
Hi
Hi,
I want to request a late source incompatible change in QtPrintSupport.
The QAbstractPritnDialog and QAbstractPageSetupDialog classes are completely
unnecessary, are given as bad examples in the Qt API design standards, and
were marked to be merged with QPrintDialog and QPageSetupDialog in Q
