Re: [Development] Switching to SPDX license expressions

2022-05-25 Thread Joerg Bornemann
On 5/24/22 15:14, Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer wrote: I'll try to participate in the summit slot for this. Maybe we can reuse Debian's DEP5 files? Yes, we might use them for 3rdparty libs in the future. In fact, they are part of the REUSE spec. And webengine is... a pain. But I gu

Re: [Development] Switching to SPDX license expressions

2022-05-24 Thread Lisandro Damián Nicanor Pérez Meyer
On Mon, 23 May 2022 at 19:12, Aleix Pol wrote: > > On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 9:24 AM Jörg Bornemann wrote: > > > > Hi, > > > > just a heads-up, because we never announced this on this mailing list: > > we're in the process of switching Qt sources from traditional license > > headers to much more co

Re: [Development] Switching to SPDX license expressions

2022-05-23 Thread Aleix Pol
On Mon, May 23, 2022 at 9:24 AM Jörg Bornemann wrote: > > Hi, > > just a heads-up, because we never announced this on this mailing list: > we're in the process of switching Qt sources from traditional license > headers to much more concise SPDX license expressions. > > Longer story here: https://w

[Development] Switching to SPDX license expressions

2022-05-23 Thread Jörg Bornemann
Hi, just a heads-up, because we never announced this on this mailing list: we're in the process of switching Qt sources from traditional license headers to much more concise SPDX license expressions. Longer story here: https://www.qt.io/blog/switching-to-spdx So far, the switch has been comp