Re: [Development] Why is QVariant::data() \internal?

2016-07-25 Thread Jędrzej Nowacki
On Wednesday 20 of July 2016 13:50:49 Olivier Goffart wrote: > On Montag, 18. Juli 2016 23:15:22 CEST Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Monday 18 July 2016 07:59:21 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote: > > > On Saturday 16 of July 2016 13:56:00 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > > > > I am currently

Re: [Development] Why is QVariant::data() \internal?

2016-07-20 Thread Olivier Goffart
On Montag, 18. Juli 2016 23:15:22 CEST Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > Hi, > > On Monday 18 July 2016 07:59:21 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote: > > On Saturday 16 of July 2016 13:56:00 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > > > I am currently interfacing two libraries that only have QVariant in > > > common, most of the

Re: [Development] Why is QVariant::data() \internal?

2016-07-18 Thread Konrad Rosenbaum
Hi, On Monday 18 July 2016 07:59:21 Jędrzej Nowacki wrote: > On Saturday 16 of July 2016 13:56:00 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > > I am currently interfacing two libraries that only have QVariant in > > common, most of the (value) types getting exchanged are either Qt > > containers or Q_GADGETs. > >

Re: [Development] Why is QVariant::data() \internal?

2016-07-18 Thread Jędrzej Nowacki
On Saturday 16 of July 2016 13:56:00 Konrad Rosenbaum wrote: > Hi, > > I am currently interfacing two libraries that only have QVariant in common, > most of the (value) types getting exchanged are either Qt containers or > Q_GADGETs. > > I was relatively quick to realize that I needed the

[Development] Why is QVariant::data() \internal?

2016-07-16 Thread Konrad Rosenbaum
Hi, I am currently interfacing two libraries that only have QVariant in common, most of the (value) types getting exchanged are either Qt containers or Q_GADGETs. I was relatively quick to realize that I needed the QMetaType and QMetaObject of these objects, but it took me pretty long to find