On 2014-02-16 12:02, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em dom 16 fev 2014, às 15:09:49, Giuseppe D'Angelo escreveu:
I guess that for Kate's purposes a small wrapper class around QRegExp
+ QRegularExpression would suffice for supporting both syntaxes. For
the future, we could instead think of adding
Em seg 17 fev 2014, às 11:06:52, Matthew Woehlke escreveu:
On 2014-02-16 12:02, Thiago Macieira wrote:
Em dom 16 fev 2014, às 15:09:49, Giuseppe D'Angelo escreveu:
I guess that for Kate's purposes a small wrapper class around QRegExp
+ QRegularExpression would suffice for supporting both
On 14 February 2014 18:25, Matthew Woehlke
mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
That said... is there any technical reason why QRegExp couldn't sprout a
PCRE expression type, that would use QRegularExpression internally? That
would neatly solve the expression types problem (though
Em dom 16 fev 2014, às 15:09:49, Giuseppe D'Angelo escreveu:
I guess that for Kate's purposes a small wrapper class around QRegExp
+ QRegularExpression would suffice for supporting both syntaxes. For
the future, we could instead think of adding wildcard and fixed-string
pattern types to
On 13 February 2014 18:52, Matthew Woehlke
mw_tr...@users.sourceforge.net wrote:
Why does the Qt5 QRegExp documentation not mention QRegularExpression?
Because it's an oversight, I guess... patches for the docs are more
than welcome! :)
(The big picture is that QRegularExpression is not a 1:1
On 2014-02-14 07:12, Giuseppe D'Angelo wrote:
On 13 February 2014 18:52, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
Why does the Qt5 QRegExp documentation not mention QRegularExpression?
Because it's an oversight, I guess... patches for the docs are more
than welcome! :)
Naturally :-). Comments like the above
On 2014-02-13 11:58, Matthew Woehlke wrote:
On 2014-02-13 11:38, Milian Wolff wrote:
QRegularExpression in Qt5 does support look-behind. [snip]
There's a new regex class? Interesting; first I'd heard of it.
Why does the Qt5 QRegExp documentation not mention QRegularExpression?
Also, in the
