On Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 09:02:11 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 17:33:52 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
> > This might be a burden for some of the Qt developers (Windows ones).
> >
> > But all the Qt users get a modern / flexible moc, see this thread:
> > h
On Thursday 25 of February 2016 19:22:55 Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 09:02:11 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 17:33:52 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
> > > This might be a burden for some of the Qt developers (Windows ones).
> > >
> > > B
olff
>
> Subject: Re: [Development] templated QObjects [was: Re: We are planning to
> upgrade qdoc to use clang for parsing C++]
>
> On Thursday 25 of February 2016 19:22:55 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 09:02:11 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On
On Freitag, 26. Februar 2016 09:43:40 CET Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On Thursday 25 of February 2016 19:22:55 Milian Wolff wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 09:02:11 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 17:33:52 PST Cristian Adam
wrote:
> > > > This migh
On sexta-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2016 20:30:28 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > The main problems of templated QObject are captured more or less in this
> >
> > thread:
> > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/development/2013-March/010288.html
> >
> > Personally I still think it would be a fancy
On Saturday 27 February 2016 00:56:08 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> Have I convinced you? I'm only getting warmed up. I'm sure I can find more
> issues.
That's all correct. But can't we create a subset of features that the QObject
template may use in order to make that subset work? After all, functio
On sábado, 27 de fevereiro de 2016 09:48:36 PST Marc Mutz wrote:
> On Saturday 27 February 2016 00:56:08 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > Have I convinced you? I'm only getting warmed up. I'm sure I can find more
> > issues.
>
> That's all correct. But can't we create a subset of features that the
> QOb
Am Freitag, 26. Februar 2016, 15:56:08 CET schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> On sexta-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2016 20:30:28 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > The main problems of templated QObject are captured more or less in
> > > this
> > >
> > > thread:
> > > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/deve
On sábado, 27 de fevereiro de 2016 12:56:11 PST Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > First of all, note that you're asking that
> >
> > a) installing generated code
> > b) including such generated code from your public headers
>
> Not necessarily installed:
> - The feature might be used only for applicat
2016-02-26 11:43 GMT+03:00 Jędrzej Nowacki :
> On Thursday 25 of February 2016 19:22:55 Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> The thought evolved over last months and now I think that QAIM should not
> be
> QObject at all, it is just an unnecessary cost.
>
>
Hm... Really? http://doc.qt.io/qt-5/qabstractitemmode
Den 27-02-2016 kl. 20:07 skrev Thiago Macieira:
On sábado, 27 de fevereiro de 2016 12:56:11 PST Olivier Goffart wrote:
First of all, note that you're asking that
a) installing generated code
b) including such generated code from your public headers
Not necessarily installed:
- The featu
On Friday 26 of February 2016 15:56:08 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > I.e. what problems would we get from having to install the
> > moc files?
>
> Lots.
And probably all go away if instead of installing anything we use
QMetaObjectBuilder (assuming it's api stabilization). Yes it would have
perform
On Monday 29 of February 2016 11:11:28 Иван Комиссаров wrote:
> 2016-02-26 11:43 GMT+03:00 Jędrzej Nowacki > On Thursday 25 of February 2016 19:22:55 Milian Wolff wrote:
> >
> > The thought evolved over last months and now I think that QAIM should not
> > be
> > QObject at all, it is just an unne
On Friday, February 26, 2016 3:56:08 PM CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On sexta-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2016 20:30:28 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > The main problems of templated QObject are captured more or less in
> > > this
> > >
> > > thread:
> > > http://lists.qt-project.org/pipermail/devel
On segunda-feira, 29 de fevereiro de 2016 10:09:51 PST Jędrzej Nowacki wrote:
> On Friday 26 of February 2016 15:56:08 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > I.e. what problems would we get from having to install the
> > > moc files?
> >
> > Lots.
>
> And probably all go away if instead of installing anyth
On segunda-feira, 29 de fevereiro de 2016 13:21:52 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> What do you say? What am I missing that would break my assumptions?
This is what Olivier proposed too.
Like I said, I don't like it, but it works.
--
Thiago Macieira - thiago.macieira (AT) intel.com
Software Architec
Am 25.02.2016 um 19:22 schrieb Milian Wolff:
Can you explain what those reasons are? I'd really love to write a generic
QAbstractTableModel implementation that operates using concepts. Currently
that would require type erasure and thus another set of virtual function
calls...
I.e. in many proje
Am 29.02.2016 um 17:40 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
On segunda-feira, 29 de fevereiro de 2016 13:21:52 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
What do you say? What am I missing that would break my assumptions?
This is what Olivier proposed too.
Like I said, I don't like it, but it works.
Well, and it's propo
On terça-feira, 1 de março de 2016 17:39:28 PST Mathias Hasselmann wrote:
> Am 29.02.2016 um 17:40 schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> > On segunda-feira, 29 de fevereiro de 2016 13:21:52 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> >> What do you say? What am I missing that would break my assumptions?
> >
> > This is what O
> On Feb 29, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> On Friday, February 26, 2016 3:56:08 PM CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On sexta-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2016 20:30:28 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
The main problems of templated QObject are captured more or less in
this
thre
On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 10:14:18 CET Ziller Eike wrote:
> > On Feb 29, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> >
> > On Friday, February 26, 2016 3:56:08 PM CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >
> >> On sexta-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2016 20:30:28 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> >>
> The main proble
> On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
>
> On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 10:14:18 CET Ziller Eike wrote:
>>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
>>>
>>> On Friday, February 26, 2016 3:56:08 PM CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
>>>
On sexta-feira, 26 de fevereiro de 2016 20:
On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 13:48:49 CET Ziller Eike wrote:
> > On Mar 2, 2016, at 11:23 AM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> >
> > On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 10:14:18 CET Ziller Eike wrote:
> >
> >>> On Feb 29, 2016, at 1:21 PM, Milian Wolff
> >>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Friday, February 26, 2016 3:56:08 PM
On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 10:14:18 PST Ziller Eike wrote:
> That would break if any other code in the application (possibly in a
> different library linked to it) has e.g. using Blah = Foo;
> right?
> That sounds pretty fragile. Especially if an application loads plugins.
Correct.
You c
On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 16:48:08 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> A simple solution would then be a macro for an explicit instantiation,
> similar to what we already do with
> Q_DECLARE_LOGGING_CATEGORY/Q_LOGGING_CATEGORY. Only there then would moc
> generate the static meta object. That shou
On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 09:47:33 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 16:48:08 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > A simple solution would then be a macro for an explicit instantiation,
> > similar to what we already do with
> > Q_DECLARE_LOGGING_CATEGORY/Q_LOGGING_CATEGORY.
On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 19:24:15 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 09:47:33 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 16:48:08 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > A simple solution would then be a macro for an explicit instantiation,
> > > similar t
On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 11:28:07 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 19:24:15 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 09:47:33 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 16:48:08 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > > A simple solution
On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 20:59:41 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> Hey Thiago,
>
> what is "the runtime merging problem on Windows"?
Ever heard of the dynamic_cast problem on Windows? It's the same.
Here's the problem:
QMetaObjects are identified by their pointer addresses: two meta objects
On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 12:59:30 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 20:59:41 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > Hey Thiago,
> >
> > what is "the runtime merging problem on Windows"?
>
> Ever heard of the dynamic_cast problem on Windows? It's the same.
Great, thanks a lot
On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 22:34:16 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 12:59:30 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 20:59:41 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > Hey Thiago,
> > >
> > > what is "the runtime merging problem on Windows"?
> >
> > Eve
Am Mittwoch, 2. März 2016, 13:43:39 CET schrieb Thiago Macieira:
> On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 22:34:16 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > On Mittwoch, 2. März 2016 12:59:30 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > On quarta-feira, 2 de março de 2016 20:59:41 PST Milian Wolff wrote:
> > > > Hey Thiago,
>
On quinta-feira, 3 de março de 2016 08:24:23 PST Olivier Goffart wrote:
> > I'm not against the principle. I am against the implementation details, as
> > Olivier's current commit has.
>
> This commit was a starting point. Of course there are implementation details
> to address.
> However, I took
Hi Milian,
On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> On Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 09:02:11 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
>> On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 17:33:52 PST Cristian Adam wrote:
>> > This might be a burden for some of the Qt developers (Windows ones).
>> >
>> > Bu
On Thursday, March 3, 2016 2:05:18 PM CET Dominik Haumann wrote:
> Hi Milian,
>
> On Thu, Feb 25, 2016 at 7:22 PM, Milian Wolff wrote:
> > On Donnerstag, 25. Februar 2016 09:02:11 CET Thiago Macieira wrote:
> >> On quinta-feira, 25 de fevereiro de 2016 17:33:52 PST Cristian Adam
wrote:
> >> > Th
On Monday 29 of February 2016 08:38:30 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On segunda-feira, 29 de fevereiro de 2016 10:09:51 PST Jędrzej Nowacki
wrote:
> > On Friday 26 of February 2016 15:56:08 Thiago Macieira wrote:
> > > > I.e. what problems would we get from having to install the
> > > > moc files?
> >
36 matches
Mail list logo
