On Fri, 27 Mar 2015 07:09:56 -0400 Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com
wrote:
On 03/25/2015 05:17 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:30:00 -0400 Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com
wrote:
On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
+ * A tty-slave is a device permanently
On 03/25/2015 05:17 PM, NeilBrown wrote:
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:30:00 -0400 Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com
wrote:
On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
+ * A tty-slave is a device permanently attached to a particularly
+ * tty, typically wired to a UART.
Why permanently?
Is
On Wed, 25 Mar 2015 12:30:00 -0400 Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com
wrote:
On 03/18/2015 01:58 AM, NeilBrown wrote:
+ * A tty-slave is a device permanently attached to a particularly
+ * tty, typically wired to a UART.
Why permanently?
Is that a limitation of the implementation or
Hi!
Header files usually have #include guards, and some kind of comment on
top.
Of 1996 files in include/linux, 1851 seem to do that. That's enough to
convince me. I've done it too.
:-)). Thanks,
Pavel
--
On Fri, 20 Mar 2015 20:41:50 +0100 Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz wrote:
Hi!
(And yes, I now see dts examples, sorry for the noise.)
Acked-by: Pavel Machek pa...@ucw.cz
Minor nits below.
--- /dev/null
+++ b/drivers/tty/slave/tty_slave_core.c
@@ -0,0 +1,136 @@
+/*
+ *
