On 04/15/2015 10:35 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com
wrote:
2. Should DT-specific drivers not be using irq_of_parse_and_map()?
On probe failure irq_dispose_mapping() will be junking the mapping,
thus invalidating the irq
On Thu, Apr 16, 2015 at 5:40 AM, Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 04/15/2015 10:35 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com
wrote:
2. Should DT-specific drivers not be using irq_of_parse_and_map()?
On probe failure
On 04/08/2015 09:40 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
This doesn't sound right. It ignores failures because platform_get_irq
will parse the interrupts when called rather than just using the
resource struct and will return EPROBE_DEFER if the irq resource is
not ready. We left the of_device_alloc code in
On Wed, Apr 15, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Peter Hurley pe...@hurleysoftware.com wrote:
On 04/08/2015 09:40 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
This doesn't sound right. It ignores failures because platform_get_irq
will parse the interrupts when called rather than just using the
resource struct and will return
Hi Rob,
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:40 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:27:27 +0200
, Geert
Hi Geert,
On Apr 8, 2015, at 11:42 , Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:27:27 +0200
, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:56
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:27:27 +0200
, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mar 24, 2015, at 07:50 ,
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:43 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
Then we have dma controllers needing to be registered at subsys_initcall()
for obvious reasons.
These should be fixable with deferred probe.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 3:42 AM, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:27:27 +0200
, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:56 PM,
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:16 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
Hi Geert,
On Apr 8, 2015, at 11:42 , Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Thu, Apr 2, 2015 at 4:38 AM, Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca
wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:27:27
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 4:17 PM, Rob Herring robherri...@gmail.com wrote:
Then we have dma controllers needing to be registered at subsys_initcall()
for obvious reasons.
These should be fixable with deferred probe. That requires fixing all
the client drivers where as fixing the dependencies
Hi Grant,
On Apr 2, 2015, at 05:38 , Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Mon, 30 Mar 2015 15:27:27 +0200
, Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org
wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mar 24, 2015,
Hi Pantelis,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mar 24, 2015, at 07:50 , Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2015, at 21:18
Hi Geert,
On Mar 30, 2015, at 16:27 , Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Pantelis,
On Tue, Mar 24, 2015 at 6:56 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mar 24, 2015, at 07:50 , Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at
Hi Pantelis, Grant,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2015, at 21:18 , Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:11:31 +0200
, Pantelis Antoniou pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com
wrote:
A nice
Hi Geert,
On Mar 24, 2015, at 07:50 , Geert Uytterhoeven ge...@linux-m68k.org wrote:
Hi Pantelis, Grant,
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 12:39 PM, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
On Mar 19, 2015, at 21:18 , Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:11:31 +0200
, Pantelis Antoniou pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com
wrote:
A nice side-effect of the changes in DTC for supporting overlays
is that it is now possible to do dependency tracking of platform
devices automatically.
This patch implements dependency aware probe
Hi Grant,
On Mar 19, 2015, at 21:18 , Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:11:31 +0200
, Pantelis Antoniou pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com
wrote:
A nice side-effect of the changes in DTC for supporting overlays
is that it is now possible to do dependency
On Fri, Mar 20, 2015 at 11:39 AM, Pantelis Antoniou
pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com wrote:
Hi Grant,
On Mar 19, 2015, at 21:18 , Grant Likely grant.lik...@secretlab.ca wrote:
On Tue, 16 Dec 2014 14:11:31 +0200
, Pantelis Antoniou pantelis.anton...@konsulko.com
wrote:
A nice side-effect of
A nice side-effect of the changes in DTC for supporting overlays
is that it is now possible to do dependency tracking of platform
devices automatically.
This patch implements dependency aware probe order for users
of of_platform_populate.
There are no changes in the syntax of the DTS bindings,
20 matches
Mail list logo
