Am Mittwoch, 2. September 2015, 14:25:48 schrieb Douglas Anderson:
> The ddc-i2c-bus property was missing from the veyron dtsi file since
> downstream the ddc-i2c-bus was still being specified in rk3288.dtsi and
> nobody noticed when the veyron dtsi was sent upstream. Add it.
>
> Signed-off-by:
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 3:22 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 07:13:24PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Douglas Anderson
>> wrote:
>> > The ddc-i2c-bus property was missing from the veyron
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:46:38AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> Yes, that is fairly common (ADV75xx is same), and we would not
> describe an I2C bus in DT in that case. Same with HPD directly handled
> vs. a GPIO line. That is no different than what Doug has said:
> ddc-i2c-bus is present if using
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:18 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:46:38AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Yes, that is fairly common (ADV75xx is same), and we would not
>> describe an I2C bus in DT in that case. Same with HPD directly handled
Hi,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 8:46 AM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
> wrote:
>> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:46:38AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>>> Yes, that is fairly common (ADV75xx is same), and we
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 10:18 AM, Russell King - ARM Linux
wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 09:46:38AM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
>> Yes, that is fairly common (ADV75xx is same), and we would not
>> describe an I2C bus in DT in that case. Same with HPD directly handled
>>
Lucas,
On Thu, Sep 3, 2015 at 9:13 AM, Lucas Stach wrote:
>> 6. Once you start using the dw_hdmi's i2c block with the currently
>> posted patch against mainline (to do this you not only need the patch
>> but you need to remove the ddc-i2c-bus property, set the pinmux, and
Hi,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The ddc-i2c-bus property was missing from the veyron dtsi file since
> downstream the ddc-i2c-bus was still being specified in rk3288.dtsi and
> nobody noticed when the veyron dtsi was sent upstream. Add it.
>
Am Donnerstag, 3. September 2015, 14:00:26 schrieb Doug Anderson:
> Hi,
>
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Douglas Anderson
wrote:
> > The ddc-i2c-bus property was missing from the veyron dtsi file since
> > downstream the ddc-i2c-bus was still being specified in
On Wed, Sep 02, 2015 at 07:13:24PM -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
> > The ddc-i2c-bus property was missing from the veyron dtsi file since
> > downstream the ddc-i2c-bus was still being specified in rk3288.dtsi and
> >
On Thu, Sep 03, 2015 at 02:00:26PM -0700, Doug Anderson wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 2:25 PM, Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
> > The ddc-i2c-bus property was missing from the veyron dtsi file since
> > downstream the ddc-i2c-bus was still being specified in rk3288.dtsi and
>
Rob,
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 5:13 PM, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Douglas Anderson
> wrote:
>> The ddc-i2c-bus property was missing from the veyron dtsi file since
>> downstream the ddc-i2c-bus was still being specified in
On Wed, Sep 2, 2015 at 4:25 PM, Douglas Anderson wrote:
> The ddc-i2c-bus property was missing from the veyron dtsi file since
> downstream the ddc-i2c-bus was still being specified in rk3288.dtsi and
> nobody noticed when the veyron dtsi was sent upstream. Add it.
>
>
The ddc-i2c-bus property was missing from the veyron dtsi file since
downstream the ddc-i2c-bus was still being specified in rk3288.dtsi and
nobody noticed when the veyron dtsi was sent upstream. Add it.
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson
---
Note: I noticed that this was
14 matches
Mail list logo