Re: [PATCH] Documentation: devicetree: arm: add lpae property to cpus/cpu bindings

2013-11-27 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 11:27 AM, Olof Johansson wrote: > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: >> Hi Olof, >> >> On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:52:52AM +, Olof Johansson wrote: >>> While the LPAE capability is determined by the kernel today, it is still >>> useful to be able to sp

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: devicetree: arm: add lpae property to cpus/cpu bindings

2013-11-27 Thread Olof Johansson
On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 1:49 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > Hi Olof, > > On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:52:52AM +, Olof Johansson wrote: >> While the LPAE capability is determined by the kernel today, it is still >> useful to be able to specify the feature in the device tree. There is >> precedence fro

Re: [PATCH] Documentation: devicetree: arm: add lpae property to cpus/cpu bindings

2013-11-27 Thread Mark Rutland
Hi Olof, On Wed, Nov 27, 2013 at 01:52:52AM +, Olof Johansson wrote: > While the LPAE capability is determined by the kernel today, it is still > useful to be able to specify the feature in the device tree. There is > precedence from other architectures for this. > > Signed-off-by: Olof Johan

[PATCH] Documentation: devicetree: arm: add lpae property to cpus/cpu bindings

2013-11-26 Thread Olof Johansson
While the LPAE capability is determined by the kernel today, it is still useful to be able to specify the feature in the device tree. There is precedence from other architectures for this. Signed-off-by: Olof Johansson --- My personal motive for this is to be able to tell which boards are work e