On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 3:45 PM, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:31:37PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
>> wrote:
>> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:20:55AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> >> Having GPIO disabl
Hello,
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:31:37PM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
> wrote:
> > On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:20:55AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> >> Having GPIO disabled means there is no GPIO support, including the
> >> ability to lo
On Tue, Apr 28, 2015 at 12:21 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:20:55AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
>> I should have replied one month ago, but if gpiolib is disabled, how
>> can we use gpiolib-like logic to check the existence of a GPIO?
>>
>> Having GPIO dis
Hello,
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 11:20:55AM +0900, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> I should have replied one month ago, but if gpiolib is disabled, how
> can we use gpiolib-like logic to check the existence of a GPIO?
>
> Having GPIO disabled means there is no GPIO support, including the
> ability to lo
On Thu, Apr 9, 2015 at 4:20 AM, Alexandre Courbot wrote:
> Having GPIO disabled means there is no GPIO support, including the
> ability to look for GPIOs. -ENOSYS is a well-documented error-code
> which meaning also applies to the gpio_*_optional functions (we don't
> have support for the operati
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 5:59 PM, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
> Hello,
>
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:26:26AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I wonder if gpiod_get_optional et all should be changed to return NULL
>> > instead.
>>
>> Th
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 9:59 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2015 at 09:26:26AM +0100, Linus Walleij wrote:
>> On Thu, Feb 12, 2015 at 10:03 AM, Uwe Kleine-König
>> wrote:
>>
>> > I wonder if gpiod_get_optional et all should be changed to return NULL
>> > instead.
>>
>> This is actua