On Thu, Feb 27, 2014 at 5:53 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 21:24 +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>> On 02/27/2014 09:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
>> > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 20:56 +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>> >> With a compatible string like
>> >> compatible = "foo";
>> >> checkpa
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 21:24 +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> On 02/27/2014 09:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> > On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 20:56 +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> >> With a compatible string like
> >> compatible = "foo";
> >> checkpatch will currently try to find "foo" in vendor-prefixes.txt
On 02/27/2014 09:10 PM, Joe Perches wrote:
> On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 20:56 +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
>> With a compatible string like
>>
>> compatible = "foo";
>>
>> checkpatch will currently try to find "foo" in vendor-prefixes.txt,
>> which is wrong since the vendor prefix is empty in this
On Thu, 2014-02-27 at 20:56 +0100, Florian Vaussard wrote:
> With a compatible string like
>
> compatible = "foo";
>
> checkpatch will currently try to find "foo" in vendor-prefixes.txt,
> which is wrong since the vendor prefix is empty in this specific case.
>
> Skip the vendor test if the com
With a compatible string like
compatible = "foo";
checkpatch will currently try to find "foo" in vendor-prefixes.txt,
which is wrong since the vendor prefix is empty in this specific case.
Skip the vendor test if the compatible is not like
compatible = "vendor,something";
Signed-off-by: Flori
