On Wed, Jul 15, 2015 at 09:00:12AM -0500, Zhi Li wrote:
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Shawn Guo shawn...@kernel.org wrote:
The wakeup capability is somehow linux specific, and all existing
bindings name the property linux,wakeup to reflect that, e.g.
On Thu, Jul 16, 2015 at 11:34:08AM -0700, Dmitry Torokhov wrote:
I should have said to use wakeup-source, not simply wakeup so that
we'd match with I2C annotation.
Yeah, consistency is the real motivation of this patch. I do not
like that different properties are invented for the same purpose.
On Tue, Jul 14, 2015 at 10:20 PM, Shawn Guo shawn...@kernel.org wrote:
The wakeup capability is somehow linux specific, and all existing
bindings name the property linux,wakeup to reflect that, e.g.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-matrix-keypad.txt. Let's
follow the convention.
The wakeup capability is somehow linux specific, and all existing
bindings name the property linux,wakeup to reflect that, e.g.
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/input/gpio-matrix-keypad.txt. Let's
follow the convention.
Signed-off-by: Shawn Guo shawn...@kernel.org
---
This is a fixup for
