On Mon, 01 Sep 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 09/01/2014 04:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >>On 08/29/2014 05:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> >>>On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >>>
> With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-
On 09/01/2014 04:32 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
On 08/29/2014 05:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
from deeper idle states as interrupts.
Let's add supp
On Fri, 29 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> On 08/29/2014 05:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> > On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> >
> >> With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
> >> from deeper idle states as interrupts.
> >>
> >> Let's add support for the optio
On 08/29/2014 05:56 AM, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
>
>> With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
>> from deeper idle states as interrupts.
>>
>> Let's add support for the optional second interrupt for wake-up
>> events. And then SoC
On Tue, 19 Aug 2014, Nishanth Menon wrote:
> With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
> from deeper idle states as interrupts.
>
> Let's add support for the optional second interrupt for wake-up
> events. And then SoC can wakeup and handle the event using it's
> regu
With the recent pinctrl-single changes, omaps can treat wake-up events
from deeper idle states as interrupts.
Let's add support for the optional second interrupt for wake-up
events. And then SoC can wakeup and handle the event using it's
regular handler.
Finally, to pass the wake-up interrupt in