Re: [PATCH] of/overlay: Directly include idr.h

2015-03-13 Thread Rob Herring
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 3:33 AM, Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:15:28AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: providing the interface, instead relying on an implicit inclusion. Make the dependency implict to avoid potential future build issues if the

Re: [PATCH] of/overlay: Directly include idr.h

2015-02-17 Thread Pantelis Antoniou
Hi Mark, On Feb 17, 2015, at 04:36 , Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org wrote: The overlay code uses IDRs but does not explicitly include the header providing the interface, instead relying on an implicit inclusion. Make the dependency implict to avoid potential future build issues if the

Re: [PATCH] of/overlay: Directly include idr.h

2015-02-17 Thread Mark Brown
On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 11:15:28AM +0200, Pantelis Antoniou wrote: providing the interface, instead relying on an implicit inclusion. Make the dependency implict to avoid potential future build issues if the s/implicit/explicit/ signature.asc Description: Digital signature

[PATCH] of/overlay: Directly include idr.h

2015-02-16 Thread Mark Brown
The overlay code uses IDRs but does not explicitly include the header providing the interface, instead relying on an implicit inclusion. Make the dependency implict to avoid potential future build issues if the implicit inclusion goes away. Signed-off-by: Mark Brown broo...@kernel.org ---