Hi Felipe,
> Sent: Thursday, April 09, 2015 6:06 PM
>
> On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 01:17:44AM +0100, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > Hi Mark,
> >
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > > Since the DT should describe the hardware (not the driver limitation)
On Thu, Apr 09, 2015 at 01:17:44AM +0100, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> Hi Mark,
>
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > > Since the DT should describe the hardware (not the driver limitation),
> > > This patch revises the binding document about the dma-names
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:42 PM, Yoshihiro Shimoda
wrote:
> Since the DT should describe the hardware (not the driver limitation),
> This patch revises the binding document about the dma-names to change
> simple numbering as "ch%d" instead of "tx" and "rx".
>
> Also this patch fixes the actual cod
Hi Mark,
>
> On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> > Since the DT should describe the hardware (not the driver limitation),
> > This patch revises the binding document about the dma-names to change
> > simple numbering as "ch%d" instead of "tx" and "rx".
>
> The na
On Wed, Apr 08, 2015 at 11:42:24AM +0100, Yoshihiro Shimoda wrote:
> Since the DT should describe the hardware (not the driver limitation),
> This patch revises the binding document about the dma-names to change
> simple numbering as "ch%d" instead of "tx" and "rx".
The naming given in this patch
Since the DT should describe the hardware (not the driver limitation),
This patch revises the binding document about the dma-names to change
simple numbering as "ch%d" instead of "tx" and "rx".
Also this patch fixes the actual code of renesas_usbhs driver to handle
the new dma-names.
Signed-off-b
