Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: add initial support for the Rockchip rk3368

2015-06-26 Thread Bamvor Zhang
Hi, Heiko 2015-06-26 15:17 GMT+08:00 Heiko Stübner : > Hi Bamvor, > > Am Freitag, 26. Juni 2015, 12:35:58 schrieb Bamvor Jian Zhang: >> Could I test the code on rk3368 STB such as EKB368, CSA90? >> Is there some documents about it? > > General information on flashing generic Rockchip devices can b

Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: add initial support for the Rockchip rk3368

2015-06-26 Thread Heiko Stübner
Hi Bamvor, Am Freitag, 26. Juni 2015, 12:35:58 schrieb Bamvor Jian Zhang: > Could I test the code on rk3368 STB such as EKB368, CSA90? > Is there some documents about it? General information on flashing generic Rockchip devices can be found on [0]. That didn't change for the rk3368 it seems - al

Re: [PATCH 0/4] arm64: add initial support for the Rockchip rk3368

2015-06-25 Thread Bamvor Jian Zhang
Hi, Heiko Could I test the code on rk3368 STB such as EKB368, CSA90? Is there some documents about it? Thanks bamvor On 06/26/2015 02:12 AM, Heiko Stübner wrote: This adds initial support for the new rk3368 ARM64 soc from Rockchip. Overall it looks like someone dropped some A53 cores into

[PATCH 0/4] arm64: add initial support for the Rockchip rk3368

2015-06-25 Thread Heiko Stübner
This adds initial support for the new rk3368 ARM64 soc from Rockchip. Overall it looks like someone dropped some A53 cores into a rk3288, so it shares a lot of peripherals that only differ in details. Therefore stuff like the mmc, usb, spi, i2c controllers work out of the box. The support for the