Hello Mark,
On 16 July 2014 21:32, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:19:06PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
>> The feedback from Naveen's series was that the patches did not
>> provide a clear explanation about the rationale and goal of both
>> the series as a whole and the
On 07/16/2014 06:02 PM, Mark Brown wrote:
> On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:19:06PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
>
> *sigh* Yesterday Naveen submitted another, different, patch series also
> attempting to improve things which I'm not seeing any reference to here.
> Please coordinate with Nav
On Wed, Jul 16, 2014 at 05:19:06PM +0200, Javier Martinez Canillas wrote:
> The feedback from Naveen's series was that the patches did not
> provide a clear explanation about the rationale and goal of both
> the series as a whole and the individual changes [1].
>
> So I tried to take Navee's seri
Hello Javier,
On 16 July 2014 20:49, Javier Martinez Canillas
wrote:
> Hello Mark,
>
> The s3c64xx SPI driver DT binding is currently broken. Commit
> 3146bee ("spi: s3c64xx: Added provision for dedicated cs pin")
> added a new "cs-gpio" property and made it a requirement in
> order to make the d
Hello Mark,
The s3c64xx SPI driver DT binding is currently broken. Commit
3146bee ("spi: s3c64xx: Added provision for dedicated cs pin")
added a new "cs-gpio" property and made it a requirement in
order to make the driver behave in the same way that it used to.
The motivation of the offending com
