Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org writes:
On 03/02/2015 01:54 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
I was tempted to have the mailbox property channel support just be in
the 2835 mailbox driver itself, but mbox_request_channel() wants its
device to have the mboxes node, and that appears to be only
On Fri, Mar 6, 2015 at 10:45 AM, Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org wrote:
On 03/05/2015 12:50 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org writes:
On 03/02/2015 01:54 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
I was tempted to have the mailbox property channel support just
be in the 2835
On 03/05/2015 12:50 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
Stephen Warren swar...@wwwdotorg.org writes:
On 03/02/2015 01:54 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
I was tempted to have the mailbox property channel support just
be in the 2835 mailbox driver itself, but
mbox_request_channel() wants its device to have the
On 03/02/2015 01:54 PM, Eric Anholt wrote:
I was tempted to have the mailbox property channel support just be in
the 2835 mailbox driver itself, but mbox_request_channel() wants its
device to have the mboxes node, and that appears to be only intended
for mailbox clients, not controllers.
This
I was tempted to have the mailbox property channel support just be in
the 2835 mailbox driver itself, but mbox_request_channel() wants its
device to have the mboxes node, and that appears to be only intended
for mailbox clients, not controllers.
Signed-off-by: Eric Anholt e...@anholt.net
---
