Ulf,
On Tue, Jan 27, 2015 at 7:18 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> I asked Addy to post upstream against mmc_send_tuning(), but I guess
>> he didn't (he posted against Alex's NAKed patch instead).
>>
>> ...when I talked to him about it, Addy was asserting that when tuning
>> fails it is important (at le
On 26 January 2015 at 18:45, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Ulf,
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>> On 26 January 2015 at 12:19, Addy Ke wrote:
>>> We need to take the card pointer in execute_tuning() for mmc_send_status(),
>>
>> mmc_send_status() is an mmc core function, not int
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 09:45:07AM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> Ulf,
>
> On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> > On 26 January 2015 at 12:19, Addy Ke wrote:
> >> We need to take the card pointer in execute_tuning() for mmc_send_status(),
> >
> > mmc_send_status() is an mmc core
Ulf,
On Mon, Jan 26, 2015 at 7:15 AM, Ulf Hansson wrote:
> On 26 January 2015 at 12:19, Addy Ke wrote:
>> We need to take the card pointer in execute_tuning() for mmc_send_status(),
>
> mmc_send_status() is an mmc core function, not intended for host's to call.
>
>> but mmc->card is NULL in tuni
On 26 January 2015 at 12:19, Addy Ke wrote:
> We need to take the card pointer in execute_tuning() for mmc_send_status(),
mmc_send_status() is an mmc core function, not intended for host's to call.
> but mmc->card is NULL in tuning state. So we need change the first parameter
> of execute_tuning
We need to take the card pointer in execute_tuning() for mmc_send_status(),
but mmc->card is NULL in tuning state. So we need change the first parameter
of execute_tuning() to card pointer(struct mmc_card * card).
Signed-off-by: Addy Ke
---
drivers/mmc/core/core.c | 2 +-
drivers/mmc/h
