2013/11/12 Balaji T K :
> On Tuesday 12 November 2013 01:36 AM, Andreas Fenkart wrote:
>>
>> For now, only support SDIO interrupt if we are booted with
>> DT. This is because some platforms need special quirks. And
>> we don't want to add new legacy mux platform init code
>> callbacks any longer as
On Tuesday 12 November 2013 01:36 AM, Andreas Fenkart wrote:
For now, only support SDIO interrupt if we are booted with
DT. This is because some platforms need special quirks. And
we don't want to add new legacy mux platform init code
callbacks any longer as we are moving to DT based booting
anyw
Hi Andreas
On Mon, Nov 11, 2013 at 9:06 PM, Andreas Fenkart wrote:
> For now, only support SDIO interrupt if we are booted with
> DT. This is because some platforms need special quirks. And
> we don't want to add new legacy mux platform init code
> callbacks any longer as we are moving to DT base
For now, only support SDIO interrupt if we are booted with
DT. This is because some platforms need special quirks. And
we don't want to add new legacy mux platform init code
callbacks any longer as we are moving to DT based booting
anyways.
Broken hardware, missing the swakueup line, should fallba
From: Andreas Fenkart
For now, only support SDIO interrupt if we are booted with
DT. This is because some platforms need special quirks. And
we don't want to add new legacy mux platform init code
callbacks any longer as we are moving to DT based booting
anyways.
Broken hardware, missing the swak
From: Andreas Fenkart
For now, only support SDIO interrupt if we are booted with
DT. This is because some platforms need special quirks. And
we don't want to add new legacy mux platform init code
callbacks any longer as we are moving to DT based booting
anyways.
Broken hardware, missing the swak