Le 21/10/2015 14:41, Sudeep Holla a écrit :
>
>
> On 21/10/15 12:13, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>> On 21/10/15 12:01, Ulf Hansson wrote:
>>> On 21 October 2015 at 12:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
> [..]
>
Yes that was my intention for splitting the patches per SoC group.
Though the keyboard driver for GPIO buttons(gpio-keys) will continue to
check for/support the legacy "gpio-key,wakeup" boolean property to
enable gpio buttons as wakeup source, "wakeup-source" is the new
standard binding.
This patch replaces the legacy "gpio-key,wakeup" with the unified
On 21/10/15 11:21, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
Le 21/10/2015 12:10, Sudeep Holla a écrit :
Though the keyboard driver for GPIO buttons(gpio-keys) will continue to
check for/support the legacy "gpio-key,wakeup" boolean property to
enable gpio buttons as wakeup source, "wakeup-source" is the new
Le 21/10/2015 12:10, Sudeep Holla a écrit :
> Though the keyboard driver for GPIO buttons(gpio-keys) will continue to
> check for/support the legacy "gpio-key,wakeup" boolean property to
> enable gpio buttons as wakeup source, "wakeup-source" is the new
> standard binding.
>
> This patch replaces
On 21 October 2015 at 12:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
>
>
> On 21/10/15 11:21, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
>>
>> Le 21/10/2015 12:10, Sudeep Holla a écrit :
>>>
>>> Though the keyboard driver for GPIO buttons(gpio-keys) will continue to
>>> check for/support the legacy "gpio-key,wakeup"
On 21/10/15 12:13, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 21/10/15 12:01, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 21 October 2015 at 12:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
[..]
Yes that was my intention for splitting the patches per SoC group.
Many SoC maintainers prefer that.
Hold on! All patches that
On 21/10/15 12:01, Ulf Hansson wrote:
On 21 October 2015 at 12:25, Sudeep Holla wrote:
On 21/10/15 11:21, Nicolas Ferre wrote:
Le 21/10/2015 12:10, Sudeep Holla a écrit :
Though the keyboard driver for GPIO buttons(gpio-keys) will continue to
check for/support the