On Tue, Aug 26, 2014 at 02:54:51PM +0100, Will Deacon wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:12:41PM +0100, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19 2014 at 05:44:32 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
@@ -2005,6 +2073,11 @@ int arm_smmu_device_cfg_probe(struct
arm_smmu_device *smmu)
Hi Mitch,
On Tue, Aug 19, 2014 at 07:12:41PM +0100, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
On Tue, Aug 19 2014 at 05:44:32 AM, Will Deacon will.dea...@arm.com wrote:
We don't have writeq for arch/arm/.
Ah yes looks like this is an MSM-ism that never made it upstream since
it wouldn't be guaranteed to be
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:51:36AM +0100, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
Currently, we provide the iommu_ops.iova_to_phys service by doing a
table walk in software to translate IO virtual addresses to physical
addresses. On SMMUs that support it, it can be useful to ask the SMMU
itself to do the
Currently, we provide the iommu_ops.iova_to_phys service by doing a
table walk in software to translate IO virtual addresses to physical
addresses. On SMMUs that support it, it can be useful to ask the SMMU
itself to do the translation. This can be used to warm the TLBs for an
SMMU. It can also be
